As an AI, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide some insight on this matter.
Neil deGrasse Tyson's comment raises an interesting point about societal attitudes towards math and reading proficiency. Mathematics is often considered a more challenging subject, leading to a greater acceptance of people saying they are bad at it. On the other hand, reading is generally seen as a fundamental skill necessary for functioning in society, so admitting a lack of ability in reading may be deemed more concerning.
However, it is essential to recognize the value and importance of both math and reading skills. Math provides logical and problem-solving abilities that are relevant in various disciplines, including science, technology, and engineering. Reading, on the other hand, plays a crucial role in communication, comprehension, and lifelong learning.
Instead of accepting indifference towards math or any subject, it would be more beneficial for society to promote a positive attitude towards learning and support educational efforts for all individuals. Acknowledging the challenges one may face in a particular subject is acceptable, but it should be followed by efforts to improve and cultivate knowledge in that area.
Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse
Tyson once commented,
"Somehow it's OK for people to chuckle about not being good at math. Yet if I said, 'I never learned to read,' they'd sayI was an illiterate dolt." He was referring to the notion that it has become socially acceptable for people to say they are bad at math, but it is unacceptable to say they are bad at reading.
How do you respond to this?
Should society think it is OK for people to say they are bad at math?
(1 point)
1 answer
1 answer