Assignment Introduction:

Question

In this lesson, you have learned about coroners and forensic pathology. You have also been able to observe what goes on inside the work area of a forensic pathology laboratory. Is this something you could see yourself doing? Would you enjoy the work?

Assignment Directions:
Part 1: Working as a Coroner in 12th Century England Compared With a 21st Century Forensic Pathologist

Write at least 300 words (5 paragraphs) comparing the two professions. Which of the two would you prefer to work in and why? Describe some of the job expectations that would be difficult for you to perform?

Part 2: Working Conditions

Make a list which describes the working conditions of the position you chose in Part 1.

Assignment Guidelines:
Part 1: Your response must:

Cite specific items from the lesson regarding both the coroner's and forensic pathology.
Responses must be 5 paragraphs (300 words) in length.
Part 2: Your response must:

Cite specific items relating to either the coroner's or forensic science profession.
Responses can be in the form of bulleted lists.
Submission Requirements:
For all assignments, remember to:

Proofread for spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Use complete sentence structure and standard written English. Do not use texting abbreviations or other shortcuts.
Paragraphs must have a minimum of six sentences.

Answer 1

Part 1: Working as a Coroner in 12th Century England Compared With a 21st Century Forensic Pathologist

The professions of coroners in 12th century England and forensic pathologists in the 21st century share the common goal of determining causes of death. However, their methods, tools, and societal roles differ markedly due to advancements in medicine and changes in legal frameworks. In the medieval period, coroners often lacked formal training and relied heavily on observation and local knowledge, leading to judgments that were sometimes influenced more by superstition than by science. In contrast, modern forensic pathologists are trained medical professionals equipped with advanced tools and techniques that allow for a thorough investigation into cause of death, using science to guide their conclusions.

The role of the coroner during the 12th century was also intertwined with the local judicial system. Coroners not only determined the cause of death but also had authority over property and inheritance issues that arose from untimely deaths. They often served a dual role as investigators and judges, making decisions on the fate of the deceased’s estate. In contemporary practice, forensic pathologists operate primarily within the realm of medical investigation. Their findings are used in legal contexts, but they do not hold judicial authority. Instead, their role is to provide unbiased and scientifically-backed autopsy reports that aid in the pursuit of justice by law enforcement and legal entities.

Working conditions in the medieval period were generally harsh due to the lack of amenities and the rudimentary nature of the practices involved. A coroner of that time would often operate without the support of a laboratory or assistance from specially trained personnel. In comparison, a forensic pathologist today works in a controlled forensic laboratory environment, with access to various technologies like radiology and DNA analysis. The forensic pathologist’s workspace is designed to ensure that all evidence is collected and preserved properly, which is a significant advancement over the conditions faced by their medieval counterparts.

If I had to choose between these two professions, I would prefer to work as a forensic pathologist in the 21st century. The field allows for the application of scientific knowledge and advancements that are crucial in accurately determining causes of death. Additionally, the collaboration with law enforcement and the opportunity to deliver justice makes this profession rewarding. However, there are aspects of the job that I might find challenging, such as performing autopsies and dealing with the emotional weight of working with deceased individuals and their families.

Additionally, the pressure to produce timely and accurate reports in critical situations could also be daunting. The responsibility of providing clear, conclusive findings that may affect legal proceedings and the lives of the living is significant. Nevertheless, the chance to contribute meaningfully to society through the pursuit of truth in a methodical and scientific manner outweighs these challenges for me.

Part 2: Working Conditions

• Location: Forensic pathologists work in specialized forensic pathology laboratories, which are equipped with advanced technology and resources.

• Team Environment: Most forensic pathologists collaborate with law enforcement, toxicologists, and other forensic experts to ensure thorough investigations.

• Role Specifics: The role often involves performing autopsies, confirming identities, collecting evidence, and documenting findings meticulously.

• Safety and Biohazards: The working conditions must adhere to strict safety protocols to avoid contamination or exposure to pathogens.

• Emotional Challenges: Forensic pathologists frequently encounter emotionally charged situations, as they work with the remains of deceased individuals and interact with grieving families.

• Flexibility: The job often requires flexibility in hours, as forensic pathologists may be called in to perform autopsies or consultations on short notice, which could lead to irregular working hours.