Assess the success or failure of the Articles of Confederation in protecting the country from war.(1 point)

Responses

Under the AOC, Congress had a difficult time convincing men to fight for the country because they preferred to fight as militia men for their state instead, so it was a failure.
Under the AOC, Congress had a difficult time convincing men to fight for the country because they preferred to fight as militia men for their state instead, so it was a failure.

Under the AOC, the government had success in providing troops to protect the states from rebellion and from foreign nations because there was a strong sense of national pride at the time.
Under the AOC, the government had success in providing troops to protect the states from rebellion and from foreign nations because there was a strong sense of national pride at the time.

Under the AOC, the federal government had the power to declare war but could not effectively protect the country because it did not have an army, so it was a failure.
Under the AOC, the federal government had the power to declare war but could not effectively protect the country because it did not have an army, so it was a failure.

Under the AOC, there was a strong military and it was a success in providing protection from foreign nations and threats from within the country.

1 answer

The most accurate assessment of the success or failure of the Articles of Confederation (AOC) in protecting the country from war is:

"Under the AOC, the federal government had the power to declare war but could not effectively protect the country because it did not have an army, so it was a failure."

This response highlights the limitations of the AOC, specifically its inability to maintain a standing army or effectively coordinate military efforts, leading to challenges in defending the nation against both internal and external threats. The lack of a centralized military authority and reliance on state militias contributed to its ineffectiveness in protection during times of conflict.