As you learned, many aspects of life would be greatly different had it not been for the advancements of engineers and their combination of artistic skills. For the following activity, analyze the changes in artistic styles and engineering over the course of time. In order to examine the use of art and engineering, you will need to examine the following areas in each of the designs:

What types of materials were used in the construction of the house?
How does the design of the house reflect the time period it was created in?
What technology is obvious in the house design? (For example, how was heating and cooling dealt with? How was lighting handled?)
What are the similarities between the two designs?
What are the aesthetic qualities of the designs?
The first of the following two buildings is made of logs, wood, and stone available in the area. The second is made of glass and wood that could have been shipped. The first design is rustic and made for its utilitarian purpose. The second design is sleek and interesting to reflect the technology available at the time. The first house does not have glass windows because they were not available, and relies on open doors to keep it cool and a fireplace to keep it warm. Light is provided by open doors and windows and candles. The second house relies on electric light and central air and heat. They are similar in that they are both structures that provide shelter for the individuals who live there. The first building is simple and functional. The second building is refined and interesting.

A simple log cabin sits in a grassy clearing in a forest.

A white house with two floors has a contemporary architectural design.

Now you will research two buildings that you find to have an interesting design. These can be office buildings, homes, football stadiums, or any structure that you are interested in, but you will need to pick two that are the same type of building. Address the five questions about the previous houses. Use the Comparison worksheet to write a brief summary of the buildings you chose, and outline the similarities and differences between the two designs. In the Evaluate section of this lesson, you will post your worksheet to the discussion board and respond to the postings of two other students./Artwork Description Artwork Source
Comparison
How are the works similar?
How are the works different?

11 answers

Building Comparison Worksheet

Building 1: Fallingwater (by Frank Lloyd Wright)

  • Material: Predominantly constructed using local stone, concrete, and glass.
  • Design Reflection: Built in the 1930s, Fallingwater exemplifies the organic architecture movement, harmonizing with its natural surroundings. It features cantilevered terraces that blend into the landscape, reflecting a progressive break from traditional styles.
  • Technology: The house incorporates large glass windows to capitalize on natural lighting and boasts a flat roof that allows for a unique cooling process through natural ventilation. Heating was managed with a central fireplace, but large overhanging roofs provide shade in summer.
  • Aesthetic Qualities: Fallingwater is renowned for its open floor plan and its integration into the waterfall landscape, creating a seamless transition between indoor and outdoor spaces.

Building 2: The Shard (London)

  • Material: Constructed primarily of glass and steel.
  • Design Reflection: Completed in 2012, The Shard showcases modern design principles with its towering, sleek, and angular structure that symbolizes contemporary urban architecture and innovation.
  • Technology: The Shard utilizes advanced building technologies, including a state-of-the-art heating and cooling system, energy-efficient glass, and automated lighting systems that reduce reliance on natural light during the day.
  • Aesthetic Qualities: The Shard's elegant and striking silhouette dominates the London skyline, with a glass façade that reflects the changing light, creating an ever-evolving aesthetic experience.

Similarities and Differences

Similarities:

  • Both structures serve the purpose of providing shelter and space for human activities—Fallingwater as a residence and The Shard as a mixed-use skyscraper (offices, restaurants, viewing platform).
  • Each building represents a significant architectural achievement for its respective era, embodying characteristics of their time and responding to environmental stimuli.
  • Both utilize large glass elements to incorporate natural light and enhance the user experience within the spaces.

Differences:

  • The materials significantly differ; Fallingwater uses organic local materials to blend with its natural surroundings, whereas The Shard’s steel and glass represent the modern industrial age and urban development.
  • Fallingwater emphasizes harmony with nature and organic forms, while The Shard focuses on height and modernity, aiming to make a bold statement in an urban landscape.
  • The technological solutions differ greatly, with Fallingwater relying on minimalism and more passive heating/cooling strategies compared to The Shard’s advanced technology systems designed for energy efficiency and flexibility in an ever-busy city environment.

Summary

In comparing Fallingwater and The Shard, we see two distinct architectural approaches that highlight the evolution of engineering and design philosophies over time. Fallingwater, with its roots in the early 20th century, draws on local materials and natural harmony, while The Shard exemplifies cutting-edge design and materials indicative of modern urban architecture. Each building reflects the values, technologies, and artistic inclinations of its respective era, showcasing the rich tapestry of architectural advancement.

no extra details also what tiape of floor do they have or stuff or how many bath oom or bed rooom

Sure! Here’s a concise comparison focusing on the key aspects you requested, including specific details like the number of rooms and floors.

Building Comparison Worksheet

Building 1: Fallingwater

  • Materials: Local stone, concrete, glass.
  • Design Reflection: Built in the 1930s, integrates with its natural surroundings.
  • Technology: Uses natural ventilation, large windows for lighting, central fireplace for heat.
  • Rooms: 5 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms.
  • Floors: 3 levels.
  • Floor Type: Wooden floors.
  • Aesthetic Qualities: Organic design, harmonizes with landscape.

Building 2: The Shard

  • Materials: Glass and steel.
  • Design Reflection: Completed in 2012, modern urban architectural style.
  • Technology: Advanced heating/cooling systems, energy-efficient glass, automated lighting.
  • Rooms: Multiple offices, restaurants, viewing platforms (specific residential spaces not applicable since it's primarily commercial).
  • Floors: 95 floors total.
  • Floor Type: Concrete and tile in public areas; commercial-grade flooring in offices.
  • Aesthetic Qualities: Sleek, striking silhouette; reflects light.

Similarities and Differences

Similarities:

  • Both serve as buildings for human activities.
  • Each utilizes large glass elements for natural light.

Differences:

  • Materials: Organic vs. industrial.
  • Design Focus: Nature integration vs. modern urban statement.
  • Technology: Passive solutions vs. advanced systems.
  • Floor Count: 3 vs. 95.

Summary

Fallingwater emphasizes nature and organic materials, while The Shard showcases modern design with advanced technology in an urban context, reflecting their respective eras in architectural style and function.

what story it he fris one and the 2 one

Here’s a brief overview of the stories behind Fallingwater and The Shard:

Building 1: Fallingwater

  • Story: Fallingwater, designed by architect Frank Lloyd Wright in 1935, is associated with the Kaufmann family, who commissioned the house as a weekend retreat. The design was groundbreaking for its time, as it was built over a waterfall in Pennsylvania's Bear Run Nature Reserve, emphasizing harmony with nature. Wright's philosophy of organic architecture aimed to integrate structures with their environment, making Fallingwater an iconic example of this movement. The house has become a symbol of modern architecture and is a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Building 2: The Shard

  • Story: The Shard, designed by architect Renzo Piano and completed in 2012, is a prominent skyscraper located in London. Built as part of a larger redevelopment project, The Shard was envisioned to symbolize London's growth and modernization after the 2008 financial crisis. The design resembles a shard of glass breaking the skyline and is one of the tallest buildings in Europe. It features a mix of offices, restaurants, and a viewing platform, and it has quickly become a landmark known for its distinctive silhouette and modern architectural style.

Each building tells a unique story rooted in its design philosophy, context, and purpose within its environment.

no not that type of stroy like is the watwe fall 2 stroy of 5 what abt the 2 one

Got it! Here’s the information regarding the number of stories (or floors) for each building:

Building 1: Fallingwater

  • Number of Stories: 3 stories

Building 2: The Shard

  • Number of Stories: 95 stories

If you have more specific questions or need further details, feel free to ask!

what elso dose both house do

Here’s a quick overview of additional functions and features of both Fallingwater and The Shard:

Building 1: Fallingwater

  • Primary Function: Residential home.
  • Other Uses: Served as a weekend retreat for the Kaufmann family and has been open to the public as a museum since the 1960s. Visitors come to learn about its architecture and design.
  • Features:
    • Integrated with nature, with outdoor spaces (including terraces) for relaxation.
    • Featured a large living area, dining space, and a study.
    • Contains unique artistic elements designed by Wright, including furniture.

Building 2: The Shard

  • Primary Function: Mixed-use skyscraper.
  • Other Uses:
    • Houses offices, restaurants, a hotel (Shangri-La Hotel), and residential apartments.
    • Includes a viewing platform that provides panoramic views of London, attracting tourists.
  • Features:
    • The contemporary design includes advanced technologies for energy efficiency.
    • Multi-functional spaces for business and dining, making it a hub of activity.

In summary, while Fallingwater primarily serves as a residential home and museum emphasizing natural integration, The Shard functions as a modern skyscraper with diverse uses, including offices, hospitality, dining, and tourism.

how many rooms

Number of Rooms

Building 1: Fallingwater

  • Total Rooms: Approximately 10 rooms, including:
    • 5 bedrooms
    • 2 bathrooms
    • Living room, dining room, and study

Building 2: The Shard

  • Total Rooms: The Shard does not have a set number of traditional "rooms" like a house, but it includes:
    • Residential Units: Approximately 10 luxury apartments (specific room counts can vary).
    • Office Space: Over 500,000 square feet of office areas (room count varies depending on the tenants).
    • Restaurants: Several dining establishments on different floors.
    • Hotel Rooms: About 202 hotel rooms in the Shangri-La Hotel.

If you need further details about specific rooms or features, let me know!