As we move through the images, from A to E, we can see changes in the area depicted. All BUT ONE statement would be a valid conclusion about those changes.

Question

Responses

A The area was covered with water during B and C; layers D and E are not.The area was covered with water during B and C; layers D and E are not.

B There was a geological event in image D causing the layers to tilt and life.There was a geological event in image D causing the layers to tilt and life.

C Weathering and erosion helped to cover the dinosaur with many layers of sediment.Weathering and erosion helped to cover the dinosaur with many layers of sediment.

D The climate change from

Answer 1

It seems like your message is cut off at the end with "The climate change from". However, based on the provided statements A, B, and C, let's analyze them:

A: This statement indicates that the area was underwater during certain periods (B and C), which implies conditions favorable for sediment deposition. It is plausible based on typical geological processes.

B: This suggests that a geological event caused layers to tilt, which is also a common occurrence in sedimentary geology. Such events can lead to various changes in the landscape and the preservation of fossils.

C: This statement correctly highlights that weathering and erosion can result in sedimentary layers covering objects, such as a dinosaur, over time. This is another valid geological conclusion.

Since you want to identify which statement is NOT a valid conclusion about the changes shown in the images from A to E, we would need the complete options or context to accurately pinpoint that statement. However, generally speaking, statements implying usual geological processes are valid unless they contradict known scientific principles or the specific details presented in the images.

If you can provide the complete option D or any missing information, I'd be happy to assist further!