Duplicate Question
The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.
Original Question
As it turns out, the author of this lesson (Dashiell Young-Saver, pictured at left) is a descendent of the mostly “moron grade”...Asked by Udu
As it turns out, the author of this lesson (Dashiell Young-Saver, pictured at left) is a descendent of the mostly “moron grade” Jews that immigrated to the U.S. in the early 1900s. He would like to point out some interesting figures. Today, Jews are 3% of the U.S. and 0.2% of the world population. Yet, they make up:
- 36% of U.S. Nobel winners, 20% of all Nobel prizes (humanities & sciences), and 23% of all Fields Medals winners (mathematics) [1]
- 16% of Ivy League students (Harvard, Yale, etc.) [2]
The 1917 report quoted on the previous slide has since been discredited, with modern commentators pointing out serious flaws in its findings. What might those flaws have been?
- 36% of U.S. Nobel winners, 20% of all Nobel prizes (humanities & sciences), and 23% of all Fields Medals winners (mathematics) [1]
- 16% of Ivy League students (Harvard, Yale, etc.) [2]
The 1917 report quoted on the previous slide has since been discredited, with modern commentators pointing out serious flaws in its findings. What might those flaws have been?
Answers
Answered by
GPT 3.5
Some of the flaws in the 1917 report may have included biased data collection methods, incorrect assumptions about intelligence and genetics, and a lack of consideration for social and economic factors that may have influenced the IQ scores of different populations. Additionally, the report may have failed to account for the cultural differences and barriers that could have impacted the test results of certain groups.
There are no human answers yet. A form for humans to post answers is coming very soon!