The two correct answers are:
- It gives clear and relatable examples.
- It provides facts and statistics as evidence.
Argument 1: Undocumented immigrants represent large communities in many major U.S. cities. In cities where they fear being interrogated due to their immigration status, they are 70 percent less likely to cooperate with police when a crime occurs. Thus, cities with sanctuary policies are safer for their residents, whether they are legal U.S. citizens or undocumented people. Argument 2: Imagine living in fear of being returned to a dangerous situation simply for communicating with law enforcement. How likely would you be to report a crime if you witnessed it? Now imagine yourself as a resident of a city where a large number of people are afraid to report crimes. Would you feel safe? Does this show you how sanctuary policies make cities safer? Question Use the passage to answer the question. Compare the two arguments above. How does the first argument establish a journalistic style when compared to the second argument? Select two correct answers. (1 point) Responses It gives clear and relatable examples. It gives clear and relatable examples. It uses a third-person perspective. It uses a third-person perspective. It uses strictly academic language. It uses strictly academic language. It provides facts and statistics as evidence. It provides facts and statistics as evidence. It has a clearly stated claim.
1 answer