Argument 1: The Cuban embargo hurts the American economy. A study by the Cuba Policy Foundation has shown that the annual cost in terms of economic output exceeds $4 billion. Lifting the embargo would result in the creation of at least 6,000 new jobs for Americans, especially in the agricultural sectors. Argument 2: Emilia Hernandez, a second-generation Cuban American, makes the trip from Hialeah, Florida to Havana to visit her grandparents once a year. While this trip should require little more than a flash of her passport and an easy-peasy one-hour flight, it instead poses an annual headache for Ms. Hernandez. The fact that Americans can't even visit their family members without a massive ordeal shows why this embargo needs to be lifted. Use the passage to answer the question. Compare the two arguments above. How does the first argument establish a formal journalistic style when compared to the second argument? Select two correct answers.

Question

It has a clearly stated claim. It uses a third-person perspective. It provides facts and statistics as evidence. It gives clear and relatable examples. It uses strictly academic language.

Answer 1

The two correct answers that highlight how the first argument establishes a formal journalistic style compared to the second argument are:

1. It has a clearly stated claim. - The first argument explicitly outlines the main point regarding the economic impact of the Cuban embargo on the American economy.

2. It provides facts and statistics as evidence. - The first argument includes specific data from a study, such as the annual cost in economic output and the potential for job creation, which bolsters its formal and analytical approach.

The second argument, while relatable and personal, lacks the same level of formal structure and statistical evidence.