Arguing against the notion that Zambia should have introduced free tertiary education instead of prioritizing free primary and basic education involves several key points:
-
Foundation for Future Learning: Primary and basic education serves as the foundational stage for all future learning. Ensuring access to quality primary education is crucial for building literacy and numeracy skills. Without a strong foundation, the efficacy of tertiary education can be severely compromised as many students may lack the necessary skills to succeed in more advanced studies.
-
Addressing Educational Inequalities: Zambia, like many developing countries, faces significant educational disparities. Free primary education helps to bridge gaps in access and equity for marginalized and underserved populations. If resources were allocated to free tertiary education instead, many children would still be left without the basic education necessary to pursue higher learning.
-
Economic Viability: Investing in primary and basic education can have more immediate and profound impacts on the workforce. A more educated population at the primary level can lead to better employment opportunities and economic productivity in the long-term. It is crucial to develop a skilled workforce from the ground up, which starts with basic education.
-
Long-term Development Goals: Free primary education aligns with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly Goal 4, which advocates for inclusive and equitable quality education. By prioritizing primary education, Zambia can contribute to global efforts to eradicate poverty and promote sustainable economic growth.
-
Public Health and Social Outcomes: Access to education at the primary level has been linked to improved public health outcomes, reduced child mortality rates, and enhanced social cohesion. By focusing on primary education, Zambia could see substantial improvements in quality of life, which would be beneficial for societal stability and development.
-
Higher Education Readiness: The introduction of free tertiary education might inadvertently lead to an influx of students who are not adequately prepared for the rigors of higher learning. By ensuring that all children receive free and quality primary education, Zambia can nurture a generation that is more prepared and capable of taking advantage of tertiary offerings when they are ready.
-
Resource Allocation: Tertiary education typically requires significant investment in specialized infrastructures, faculty, and resources. If Zambia were to prioritize free tertiary education prematurely, it may divert crucial funds from building and maintaining primary schools, teacher training, and essential educational resources needed at the grassroots level.
In conclusion, while the aim of providing free tertiary education is admirable and potentially beneficial for economic advancement, prioritizing free primary and basic education serves as a vital stepping stone that ensures a well-prepared population capable of fully taking advantage of higher education opportunities in the future.