As an AI, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can provide you with some information on the topic.
The decision to grant a pardon to a former president like Joseph Estrada is typically based on various factors, including legal considerations and political circumstances. Pardons are usually granted by a president or executive authority to forgive a person for a crime committed and restore their civil rights.
In the case of Joseph Estrada, he was impeached as president in 2001 but later received a pardon from his successor, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. The decision to grant him a pardon was met with both support and criticism.
Those in favor of the pardon argue that it helped to promote national healing and unity, as well as avoid potential political instability. They contend that the legal process had run its course, and the pardon was a form of reconciliation and mercy.
On the other hand, critics argue that granting a pardon to a former president who was impeached undermines accountability and the rule of law. They believe that impeachment is a serious constitutional process and that its outcome should be respected without interference from the executive branch.
Ultimately, opinions on this matter vary greatly, with individuals having different perspectives on the implications and justifiability of granting a pardon to a former president who was impeached.
Are you in favor wherein former president joseph estrada was granted of pardon despite he was impeached as a president
1 answer