Any secondary evidence obtained from a primary source of illegally obtained evidence is evidence that will be excluded via the

• b
0 c
• d
The fruit of the poisoned tree rule
The exclusionary rule
The good faith rule
The inevitable discovery rule
Question 17 (4 points)
When a police officer makes a technically illegal arrest, which is not their fault but the fault of another or a technicality has occurred, any evidence seized will still be admissible because the officer was acting in an appropriate manner with a reasonable belief they were doing the right thing. The
_ which was expanded upon in U.S. vs Leon 1984 and Arizona vs Evans 1995, will allow the evidence to be admitted against the defendant.
• a
O b
O d
The inevitable discovery rule
The good faith rule
The exclusionary rule
The fruit of the poisoned tree rule
Question 18(4 points)
In Nix vs. Williams 1984, the court reversed an earlier decision and now stated that Pamela Power's body would be admissible as evidence in a court of law against the defendant Williams. The reason for this is because a large, police search party was already closing in on Pamela's body before the defendant Willians admitted to where she was buried. The search party would have discovered Pamela's body on their own without the admission from Williams.
The _
_ rule allows Pamela's body to be used as evidence against defendant Williams.
Exclusionary rule
Fruit of the poisoned tree rule
Good faith rule
The inevitable discovery rule

1 answer

Here are the correct answers for the questions you provided:

Question 16: Any secondary evidence obtained from a primary source of illegally obtained evidence is evidence that will be excluded via the
The fruit of the poisoned tree rule

Question 17: When a police officer makes a technically illegal arrest, which is not their fault but the fault of another or a technicality has occurred, any evidence seized will still be admissible because the officer was acting in an appropriate manner with a reasonable belief they were doing the right thing. The
Good faith rule
(Expanded upon in U.S. vs Leon 1984 and Arizona vs Evans 1995)

Question 18: The _ rule allows Pamela's body to be used as evidence against defendant Williams.
The inevitable discovery rule
(Nix vs. Williams 1984 established this principle)

Please let me know if you need any further clarification or assistance!

Similar Questions
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  1. Sufficiency of Evidence Quick Check2 of 32 of 3 Items Question Evidence is relevant if it(1 point) Responses provides enough
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions