Answer the following question in AT LEAST 3 sentences: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ General Sherman’s total war strategy during the Civil War involved attacking both the South’s military and civilian (not in the military) resources to weaken their ability to keep fighting. If you were a Union supporter at the time, how would you balance the ethical concerns of targeting civilians with the goal of ending the war quickly? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Remember to RAPP: Restate and Answer the question: If I were a Union supporter during Sherman's total war strategy, I would (believe/not believe) that ending the war outweighed the damage done to civilians. (1 Sentence) Provide evidence and explain: The loss of civilian life and property was necessary to end the war because... OR The loss of civilian life and property was not necessary to end the war because... (2 sentences) Proofread your answer - fix any spelling or grammar mistakes!

Answer 1

If I were a Union supporter during Sherman's total war strategy, I would believe that ending the war outweighed the damage done to civilians. The loss of civilian life and property was necessary to end the war because it aimed to dismantle the Confederacy's infrastructure, which was crucial for their military efforts and morale. By demonstrating the Union's strength and resolve through such tactics, it was believed that the war would conclude more swiftly, ultimately saving more lives in the long run as prolonged conflict would lead to continued suffering.