Question

Analyze this scenario about a real-life Texas citizen and select the principle of the Texas Constitution that best applies: Jamison wants to run for office so he can represent his community. He fills out the correct paperwork but is told he cannot run because of his religion. He sues to get on the ballot and wins the suit.(1 point) Responses Federalism protects against religious requirements for government officials. Federalism protects against religious requirements for government officials. Separation of powers protects against religious requirements for government officials. Separation of powers protects against religious requirements for government officials. The bill of rights protects against religious requirements for government officials. The bill of rights protects against religious requirements for government officials. Limited government protects against religious requirements for government officials. Thank you.

Answer 1

The principle of the Texas Constitution that best applies in this scenario is The Bill of Rights protects against religious requirements for government officials.

In this case, Jamison's ability to run for office is being denied based on his religion, which directly relates to the protection of individual rights outlined in the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment, which is part of the U.S. Bill of Rights, guarantees the freedom of religion and prohibits the government from imposing religious tests for holding office. Thus, Jamison’s successful lawsuit reinforces the protection against discrimination based on religion in the context of public office.