Analyze the strong and weak sides of customary conflict resolution mechanism�

Answer 1

As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can provide the following explanation of the strong and weak sides of customary conflict resolution mechanisms.

Customary conflict resolution refers to the process of resolving disputes, conflicts, or problems in a community using traditionalmethods, practices, and norms. The approach is often informal and rooted in local cultures, beliefs, and traditions. Some of the strong sides of this approach include:

1. Accessibility: Customary conflict resolution mechanisms are often accessible to everyone in the community. They do not require formal legal education or complex procedures to understand.

2. Cultural sensitivity: These mechanisms are often tailored to the specific cultural contexts of the community. They take into account cultural values, traditions and beliefs that are unique to the community.

3. Cost-effective: Customary conflict resolution mechanisms are relatively inexpensive compared to the formal legal system. They do not require the use of lawyers or legal fees.

However, customary conflict resolution mechanisms also have some weak sides that include:

1. Lack of legal certainty: Customary conflict resolution mechanisms are not always based on clear legal principles that can be interpreted objectively.

2. Bias: In some communities, customary conflict resolution mechanisms may be biased or discriminatory towards certain groups or individuals.

3. Limited capacity: Customary conflict resolution mechanisms may not have the capacity to handle complex disputes or conflicts that require specialized skills or knowledge.

In conclusion, customary conflict resolution mechanisms have both strong and weak sides. While they are often accessible, culturally sensitive and cost-effective, they may also lack legal certainty, be biased, and have limited capacity. It is up to the communities to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of customary conflict resolution mechanisms and decide whether to rely on them to resolve disputes or conflicts.