The correct option is:
This action is symbolic speech. The action symbolizes a viewpoint.
Analyze the reason that the Supreme Court found the burning of a flag to be protected free speech as it did in Texas v. Johnson.(1 point)
Responses
This action, if done on private property, is within the rights of a private citizen.
This action, if done on private property, is within the rights of a private citizen.
This action did not defame or insult anyone. It created no harm.
This action did not defame or insult anyone. It created no harm.
This action is symbolic speech. The action symbolizes a viewpoint.
This action is symbolic speech. The action symbolizes a viewpoint.
This action is legal as long as it is done in a respectful manner in order to dispose of an old flag.
chose an option!!!
5 answers
sure
The Supreme Court found that the burning of a flag is protected free speech because it is considered symbolic speech. In the case Texas v. Johnson, the defendant, Gregory Lee Johnson, burned the American flag as a form of protest during the 1984 Republican National Convention. The Court ruled that Johnson's act of flag burning was expressive conduct and fell under the umbrella of protected speech guaranteed by the First Amendment.
The Court's reasoning was based on the understanding that the act of burning the flag was a form of symbolic expression and an exercise of political speech. Symbolic speech refers to actions or conduct that convey a particular message or viewpoint. In this case, Johnson's act symbolized his disagreement with the government and his protest against certain policies.
The Court emphasized that the government cannot prohibit or compel certain forms of expression based on the content of the message. Even though flag burning might be condemned as disrespectful or offensive to some, the Court determined that society's strong interest in safeguarding freedom of speech outweighed any potential offense caused by this form of expression.
Therefore, the Supreme Court found that the act of burning a flag as a form of protest falls within the realm of protected free speech under the First Amendment.
The Court's reasoning was based on the understanding that the act of burning the flag was a form of symbolic expression and an exercise of political speech. Symbolic speech refers to actions or conduct that convey a particular message or viewpoint. In this case, Johnson's act symbolized his disagreement with the government and his protest against certain policies.
The Court emphasized that the government cannot prohibit or compel certain forms of expression based on the content of the message. Even though flag burning might be condemned as disrespectful or offensive to some, the Court determined that society's strong interest in safeguarding freedom of speech outweighed any potential offense caused by this form of expression.
Therefore, the Supreme Court found that the act of burning a flag as a form of protest falls within the realm of protected free speech under the First Amendment.
are you sure????
I apologize for any confusion caused. The correct option is:
This action is symbolic speech. The action symbolizes a viewpoint.
This action is symbolic speech. The action symbolizes a viewpoint.