Analyze the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point) Responses Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent. Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent. Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses. Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses. Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause. Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause. Miranda was not warned of his right to a phone call.

Answer 1

The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) is that Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.