The Articles of Confederation, which governed the United States from 1781 to 1789, established a decentralized system of government that favored state sovereignty. Under this framework, each state retained significant independence and power, with a weak central government that lacked the authority to impose taxes or regulate commerce effectively. The geographic distribution of power was characterized by equal representation among states regardless of size or population, as each state had one vote in Congress.
In analyzing which state among New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia would prefer this distribution of power, the following considerations can be made:
-
New York: As a large and populous state, New York had significant economic interests and a strong desire for a more powerful central government that could regulate commerce and provide stability.
-
New Jersey: New Jersey, smaller and less populous than New York but larger than some other states, might have preferred the Articles as it ensured equal representation in Congress, allowing it to wield similar power to larger states in certain matters.
-
Pennsylvania: Being a large state with a significant population and economic interests, Pennsylvania would likely have favored a stronger central government rather than the decentralized power structure of the Articles of Confederation.
-
Virginia: Virginia, as the largest state at the time, likely preferred a system that would allow it to leverage its size and population for greater influence in national politics. It may have wanted a more balanced approach rather than the equal representation framework of the Articles.
Considering these points, New Jersey would likely prefer the geographic distribution of power established by the Articles of Confederation. The equal representation it guaranteed allowed smaller states like New Jersey to maintain influence on a level comparable to more populous states, which was crucial for ensuring their interests were not overshadowed by larger states.
6 answers