Analyze how the authors of “Roads that Last” and “Cracks to Squiggles” each present conflicting information about asphalt.

Question

Responses
A “Roads that Last” emphasizes asphalt’s historical use while “Cracks to Squiggles” shows innovative use of asphalt to patch roads.“Roads that Last” emphasizes asphalt’s historical use while “Cracks to Squiggles” shows innovative use of asphalt to patch roads.
B “Roads that Last” states that asphalt fractures readily while “Cracks to Squiggles” mentions that asphalt prevents cracking.“Roads that Last” states that asphalt fractures readily while “Cracks to Squiggles” mentions that asphalt prevents cracking.
C “Roads that Last” says that asphalt is adhesive while “Cracks to Squiggles” mentions that asphalt is a sealer.“Roads that Last” says that asphalt is adhesive while “Cracks to Squiggles” mentions that asphalt is a sealer.
D “Roads that Last” indicates that asphalt is a costly material while “Cracks to Squiggles” suggests asphalt is inexpensive.

Answer 1

The best option that highlights the conflicting information presented by the authors of “Roads that Last” and “Cracks to Squiggles” is:

B: “Roads that Last” states that asphalt fractures readily while “Cracks to Squiggles” mentions that asphalt prevents cracking.

This response effectively captures a clear contradiction in the portrayal of asphalt's properties, with one source suggesting that it is prone to fracturing and the other indicating it has protective qualities that help prevent cracking. This kind of conflict underscores differing perspectives on asphalt's performance and durability, making it a relevant choice for analysis.