To determine which statement is true, we need to analyze each option based on the information provided. Since we don't have specific information about the placements of points A, B, C, and D relative to one another, we will do a logical evaluation of each statement:
a. In the interval from point A to point D, the object travels 11 m.
- This statement could be true if the distance from A to D is indeed 11 m.
b. In the interval from point A to point B, the object travels 30 m.
- This statement implies the distance from A to B is 30 m. It can be true or false but we don’t have the context to verify it.
c. In the interval from point C to point D, the object travels 0 m.
- This statement indicates that point C and point D are the same point, meaning there's no distance between them. This could be true if that is the case in this scenario.
d. In the interval from point B to point C, the object travels 30 m.
- Similar to option b, this depends on the specific positions of points B and C.
Without additional context about the distances and relationships between the points A, B, C, and D, we cannot definitively determine which statement is true.
However, if option c is indeed valid based on how we perceive points C and D relative to each other, it would indicate an absence of distance traveled in that segment. Conversely, if points A to D covers a distance of 11m, then option a may be true as well.
In summary:
- If C and D are the same point, option c is true.
- If it is indeed stated that the distance from A to D is 11 m, then option a could also be true.
The truth of each statement cannot be conclusively determined without further information on the distances and placements of the points involved. Would you be able to provide more context or specific details about the distances?