An earthquake occurs at a convergent boundary. The earthquake has a high magnitude, and an observer reports the earthquake having low intensity. Which statement about the earthquake is correct?(1 point)

Question

Responses

The earthquake was caused by plates moving apart. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage.
The earthquake was caused by plates moving apart. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage.

The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage.
The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage.

The earthquake was caused by plates moving apart. It did not release much energy, but the observer saw a lot of damage.
The earthquake was caused by plates moving apart. It did not release much energy, but the observer saw a lot of damage.

The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It did not release much energy, but the observer saw a lot of damage.

Answer 1

The correct statement about the earthquake is:

The earthquake was caused by plates moving together. It released a lot of energy, but the observer did not see much damage.

This aligns with the characteristics of an earthquake at a convergent boundary, where tectonic plates collide, often producing significant energy release and resulting in strong earthquakes. However, if an observer reports low intensity, it might indicate that the structural damage was minimal in that specific area, possibly due to factors such as distance from the epicenter or building resilience.