Asked by axel
An arts and crafts store sells sheets of stickers. Use the table to write an equation you can use to find the total cost y in dollars for x sheets of stickers.
Costs of Stickers
Number of
Sheets (x)
Cost in
Dollars (y)
14
19.00
17
nothing15.75
11
24.75
14
31.50
Question content area bottom
Part 1
You can use the equation yequals
enter your response here to find the total cost y in dollars for x sheets of stickers.
Costs of Stickers
Number of
Sheets (x)
Cost in
Dollars (y)
14
19.00
17
nothing15.75
11
24.75
14
31.50
Question content area bottom
Part 1
You can use the equation yequals
enter your response here to find the total cost y in dollars for x sheets of stickers.
Answers
There are no human answers yet.
Answered by
GPT-4o mini
To form an equation to represent the total cost \( y \) based on the number of sheets \( x \), we can analyze the data provided.
Let's record the valid price data based on the details provided:
- For \( x = 14 \), \( y = 19.00 \)
- For \( x = 17 \), \( y = 15.75 \) (however, this entry appears to have an issue since it's labeled “nothing”)
- For \( x = 11 \), \( y = 24.75 \)
- For \( x = 14 \), \( y = 31.50 \)
Notice that there may be an inconsistency or overlapping values for \( x = 14 \) where we have two different costs.
To establish a linear equation, we can take the pairs that provide a clear relationship. We can use the points:
1. \( (11, 24.75) \)
2. \( (14, 19.00) \)
3. \( (14, 31.50) \)
Given the data is unclear especially for \( x = 14\), let's focus on valid pairs or find the average cost based on consistent data.
Assuming a linear relationship, we can find \( y \) based on the average cost per sheet.
For instance, let's analyze:
1. For \( (11, 24.75) \):
- The average cost = \( \frac{24.75}{11} \approx 2.25 \) dollars per sheet.
2. Kin \( (14, 31.50) \):
- The average cost = \( \frac{31.50}{14} \approx 2.25 \) dollars per sheet.
Given these considerations, we could generalize as:
\[
y = 2.25x
\]
Thus, the equation you can use to find the total cost \( y \) in dollars for \( x \) sheets of stickers is:
\[
y = 2.25x
\]
Make sure to validate the exact prices again if using this for a business or pricing strategy since there seems to be an inconsistency in sticker costs.
Let's record the valid price data based on the details provided:
- For \( x = 14 \), \( y = 19.00 \)
- For \( x = 17 \), \( y = 15.75 \) (however, this entry appears to have an issue since it's labeled “nothing”)
- For \( x = 11 \), \( y = 24.75 \)
- For \( x = 14 \), \( y = 31.50 \)
Notice that there may be an inconsistency or overlapping values for \( x = 14 \) where we have two different costs.
To establish a linear equation, we can take the pairs that provide a clear relationship. We can use the points:
1. \( (11, 24.75) \)
2. \( (14, 19.00) \)
3. \( (14, 31.50) \)
Given the data is unclear especially for \( x = 14\), let's focus on valid pairs or find the average cost based on consistent data.
Assuming a linear relationship, we can find \( y \) based on the average cost per sheet.
For instance, let's analyze:
1. For \( (11, 24.75) \):
- The average cost = \( \frac{24.75}{11} \approx 2.25 \) dollars per sheet.
2. Kin \( (14, 31.50) \):
- The average cost = \( \frac{31.50}{14} \approx 2.25 \) dollars per sheet.
Given these considerations, we could generalize as:
\[
y = 2.25x
\]
Thus, the equation you can use to find the total cost \( y \) in dollars for \( x \) sheets of stickers is:
\[
y = 2.25x
\]
Make sure to validate the exact prices again if using this for a business or pricing strategy since there seems to be an inconsistency in sticker costs.
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.