Although William Shakespeare’s (2006) Julius Caesar and Chinua Achebe’s (1958) Things Fall Apart are set in different time periods and locations, they share commonalities in their portrayal of characters and their tragic downfalls. In a logically structured essay, analyse how two heroic and honourable characters of your choice (one from Julius Caesar and one from Things Fall Apart) meet with suffering and a tragic end due to either their personal flaws or a combination of their own personal flaws and external forces beyond their control.

1 answer

In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the character of Brutus can be seen as a heroic and honourable figure who ultimately meets a tragic end due to a combination of his own personal flaws and external forces beyond his control. Brutus is portrayed as a noble and honourable man who is motivated by his loyalty to Rome and his belief in the greater good. However, his fatal flaw lies in his naivety and idealism, which leads him to make decisions that ultimately lead to his downfall.

One of Brutus’s personal flaws is his naivety in trusting others, particularly his fellow conspirators. Despite warnings from Cassius to not trust Mark Antony, Brutus allows Antony to speak at Caesar’s funeral, believing that Antony will not incite the crowd against the conspirators. This decision proves to be a fatal mistake, as Antony’s speech ignites a riot and leads to civil war in Rome. Brutus’s blind trust in others ultimately leads to his downfall, as he is outmaneuvered by Antony and Octavius in battle.

In Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, the character of Okonkwo can be seen as another heroic and honourable figure who meets a tragic end due to a combination of his own personal flaws and external forces beyond his control. Okonkwo is a proud and hardworking man who is motivated by his desire to live up to his father’s legacy and achieve greatness in his village. However, his fatal flaw lies in his fear of appearing weak, which leads him to make rash decisions that ultimately lead to his downfall.

One of Okonkwo’s personal flaws is his inability to adapt to change and embrace the new ways brought by the colonizers. Okonkwo resists the influence of the missionaries and colonial government, clinging to the traditional ways of his people. This refusal to change ultimately leads to his banishment from the village and the destruction of his way of life. Okonkwo’s stubbornness and pride prevent him from accepting the inevitable changes in his society, leading to his tragic end.

In conclusion, both Brutus and Okonkwo can be seen as heroic and honourable characters who meet tragic ends due to a combination of their own personal flaws and external forces beyond their control. Their stories serve as cautionary tales about the dangers of pride, naivety, and the refusal to adapt to change. Through their tragic downfalls, Shakespeare and Achebe explore the consequences of hubris and the importance of self-awareness in the face of adversity.