Again, look at the table. Examine the saturated thickness levels between 1975 and 1990 and between 1995 and 2010. Each of these are fifteen-year spans, but the decrease in saturated thickness is not the same. Even if the population were to stay the same over this time, why do you think the drop in thickness is not as great?

1 answer

The difference in the drop in saturated thickness between the two fifteen-year spans (1975-1990 and 1995-2010) can be attributed to several factors, even if the population remained constant. Here are some possible explanations:

  1. Conservation Efforts: Between the two time periods, there may have been increased awareness and implementation of water conservation practices. Technologies and methods for more efficient water use might have been adopted, leading to reduced extraction rates.

  2. Regulatory Changes: New regulations or policies regarding groundwater extraction could have been enacted after 1990 that limited the amount of water that could be withdrawn, contributing to a slower decrease in saturated thickness.

  3. Changes in Water Sources: There may have been a shift in the sources of water supply during the later period. For example, communities might have invested in alternative sources such as surface water, recycled water, or desalinization, reducing dependency on groundwater.

  4. Climate Variability: Variations in weather patterns, such as increased rainfall or changes in drought cycles, could significantly affect groundwater recharge rates and, thus, the saturated thickness. If the later period experienced more favorable climatic conditions, that could result in less depletion.

  5. Well Management Practices: Improved groundwater management practices, such as better monitoring of water levels and careful planning of groundwater use, may have been implemented, leading to more sustainable extraction rates.

  6. Technological Advances: Advances in technology may have made it possible to more accurately drill for water and assess the aquifer's characteristics, leading to more efficient use of groundwater resources and less waste.

  7. Demographic Changes: Though you mentioned the population remained the same, there could have been demographic shifts in terms of water usage, such as changes in residential usage patterns or a decrease in industrial water consumption.

All of these factors combined could contribute to a slower rate of decrease in saturated thickness during the later period as compared to the earlier one, despite a constant population.

Similar Questions
    1. answers icon 17 answers
  1. The Problem:The population of Manitoba from 1975 to 2010 is given in 5-year increments. Year/Population 1975 1,019,529 1980
    1. answers icon 4 answers
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Moose Population Trends in Bullwinkle National ParkYear Population 1970 788 1975 654 1980 578 1985 609 1990 275 1995 350 2000
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions