After investigating some examples of natural resource development, what can you conclude about the social, political, and environmental consequences?(1 point)
Responses
The development and use of natural resources has mostly negative consequences for a country.
The development and use of natural resources has mostly negative consequences for a country.
The development and use of natural resources can have many positive and negative consequences for a country.
The development and use of natural resources can have many positive and negative consequences for a country.
The development and use of natural resources on a large scale always led to war and political or social oppression.
The development and use of natural resources on a large scale always led to war and political or social oppression.
The development and use of natural resources drives a country’s economy and therefore has mostly good consequences for the people there.
9 answers
The development and use of natural resources can have many positive and negative consequences for a country. It can drive economic growth and provide employment opportunities, but it can also lead to environmental degradation, displacement of communities, and political conflicts. It is important for governments to carefully consider the social, political, and environmental impacts of natural resource development to ensure sustainable and equitable outcomes.
Why are natural resources good for autocratic governments in the DRC and Saudi Arabia?(1 point)
Responses
The governments gain power and money by controlling natural resources.
The governments gain power and money by controlling natural resources.
The governments use money from resources to control their citizens.
The governments use money from resources to control their citizens.
The governments can use their natural resources to support democratization.
The governments can use their natural resources to support democratization.
The governments can provide good jobs for their citizens.
Responses
The governments gain power and money by controlling natural resources.
The governments gain power and money by controlling natural resources.
The governments use money from resources to control their citizens.
The governments use money from resources to control their citizens.
The governments can use their natural resources to support democratization.
The governments can use their natural resources to support democratization.
The governments can provide good jobs for their citizens.
The governments gain power and money by controlling natural resources. In countries like the Democratic Republic of Congo and Saudi Arabia, natural resources such as oil, minerals, and natural gas play a significant role in generating revenue for the government. This revenue can be used to maintain control over the population, fund security forces, and support the regime in power. Additionally, the control of natural resources can be a source of wealth and power for those in government.
After investigating how the growth of multinationals, governments, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) has affected natural resource production, distribution, and consumption, which statement is the most accurate?(1 point)
Responses
Multinationals work to develop the entire economy of different countries with the help of governments and NGOs.
Multinationals work to develop the entire economy of different countries with the help of governments and NGOs.
Multinationals are less powerful in natural resource development than governments and NGOS.
Multinationals are less powerful in natural resource development than governments and NGOS.
Multinationals may cause problems that can sometimes be solved by governments and NGOs.
Multinationals may cause problems that can sometimes be solved by governments and NGOs.
Multinationals may refuse to work with governments and NGOs to develop natural resources.
Responses
Multinationals work to develop the entire economy of different countries with the help of governments and NGOs.
Multinationals work to develop the entire economy of different countries with the help of governments and NGOs.
Multinationals are less powerful in natural resource development than governments and NGOS.
Multinationals are less powerful in natural resource development than governments and NGOS.
Multinationals may cause problems that can sometimes be solved by governments and NGOs.
Multinationals may cause problems that can sometimes be solved by governments and NGOs.
Multinationals may refuse to work with governments and NGOs to develop natural resources.
Multinationals may cause problems that can sometimes be solved by governments and NGOs. Based on the influence and impact of multinationals, governments, and NGOs in natural resource production, distribution, and consumption, it is evident that multinationals can sometimes cause problems such as environmental degradation, labor exploitation, and social conflicts. These issues can be addressed and mitigated through the involvement and regulation by governments and NGOs to ensure sustainable and responsible resource management.
Which of the following statements best summarizes the impact of an environmental issue on Syria?(1 point)
Responses
Syria’s native species are under threat by introduced predators.
Syria’s native species are under threat by introduced predators.
Syria’s reliance on water lenses makes its freshwater access vulnerable.
Syria’s reliance on water lenses makes its freshwater access vulnerable.
Syria’s drought is threatening its people’s access to water, food, electricity, and medical care.
Syria’s drought is threatening its people’s access to water, food, electricity, and medical care.
Syria’s melting glaciers could flood the nation and destroy entire cities.
Responses
Syria’s native species are under threat by introduced predators.
Syria’s native species are under threat by introduced predators.
Syria’s reliance on water lenses makes its freshwater access vulnerable.
Syria’s reliance on water lenses makes its freshwater access vulnerable.
Syria’s drought is threatening its people’s access to water, food, electricity, and medical care.
Syria’s drought is threatening its people’s access to water, food, electricity, and medical care.
Syria’s melting glaciers could flood the nation and destroy entire cities.
Syria’s drought is threatening its people’s access to water, food, electricity, and medical care. The impact of the ongoing drought in Syria has severely affected the country's water resources, agriculture, food security, and overall access to basic necessities such as water and electricity. This environmental issue has exacerbated the humanitarian crisis in Syria and has led to widespread suffering among the population.
Which of the following is the most reasonable critique of the U.S. response to the Centralia coal fire?(1 point)
Responses
The U.S. is acting in a way that will eventually result in people being hurt.
The U.S. is acting in a way that will eventually result in people being hurt.
The U.S. government is not acting to protect the citizens of Centralia.
The U.S. government is not acting to protect the citizens of Centralia.
The U.S. is allowing its environment to be damaged without intervening.
The U.S. is allowing its environment to be damaged without intervening.
The U.S. government is passing the problem along to be solved by people in the future.
Responses
The U.S. is acting in a way that will eventually result in people being hurt.
The U.S. is acting in a way that will eventually result in people being hurt.
The U.S. government is not acting to protect the citizens of Centralia.
The U.S. government is not acting to protect the citizens of Centralia.
The U.S. is allowing its environment to be damaged without intervening.
The U.S. is allowing its environment to be damaged without intervening.
The U.S. government is passing the problem along to be solved by people in the future.
The U.S. is allowing its environment to be damaged without intervening. The U.S. response to the Centralia coal fire has been criticized for not taking adequate measures to address the environmental impact of the ongoing underground coal fire. This lack of intervention may be seen as allowing the environment to be damaged without taking sufficient action to mitigate the effects of the fire.
1 answer