Self-Reflection on Grade 10 History Lesson: The French Revolution
What went well in this lesson?
The lesson generated an engaging discussion among students, with several students contributing insightful perspectives on the causes and implications of the French Revolution. The use of primary sources, like letters and revolutionary pamphlets, sparked interest and made historical events feel more real to the learners. Additionally, small group activities encouraged collaboration and allowed students to articulate their thoughts.
What problems did I encounter?
One significant problem was time management. Some groups took longer to discuss their topics than I had anticipated, which left less time for the full-class discussion at the end. This led to some important points being rushed through, and some students were unable to fully share their findings.
Was it "learner-centered"? Should it have been?
Yes, I believe the lesson had a learner-centered approach as students were encouraged to explore the material through discussions and group work. However, there were moments where I dominated the conversation instead of facilitating. In hindsight, a stronger emphasis on student-led discussions would have enhanced the learner-centered nature of the lesson.
What could I have done differently?
To manage time better, I could have provided clearer time limits for group discussions. Additionally, I could have prepared more guiding questions for students to keep them focused and ensure that they covered the necessary material. A more structured outline may have helped maintain pacing throughout the lesson.
What did I learn from this experience that will help me in the future?
This experience highlighted the importance of flexibility in lesson planning. While having a structured plan is crucial, I learned that being adaptable and responsive to students’ engagement is equally important. I will consider better pacing and timing for future lessons, allowing moments for students to reflect on and share their thoughts.
Preparation and research: Was I well prepared? What could I have done differently?
I felt well-prepared in terms of content knowledge and the selection of materials. However, I realize now that I could have conducted a brief pre-assessment to gauge students' prior knowledge, which would have informed my lesson and allowed for more targeted discussions.
Written plan: Was I organized? Did the written format work? Is there a better form?
While my written plan covered all necessary elements, it was perhaps too detailed in some areas and overlooked the importance of flexibility. I believe a less rigid outline that allows space for student input and discussion could be more effective in the future.
Presentation: Were the learners involved? Was I clear in my presentation? How was the pacing?
Most learners were involved in the lesson, especially during the group discussions. However, I noticed that my pacing could have been improved during my initial presentation. I rushed through some key points that needed more clarification. I also need to give students more time to digest information before moving on to the next topic.
Assessment: Does my method of assessment measure what I want? How did the class do? What should I change for next time?
The assessment method I used—group presentations—obviously helped measure students’ understanding of the material. While most student groups performed well, the rushed concluding discussion revealed gaps in some students' understanding. For next time, I could include a formative assessment, like a quick exit ticket asking students to summarize what they learned, which would provide immediate feedback for both them and me.
This lesson serves as a valuable experience for refining my teaching strategies, ensuring that each class is more engaging, organized, and aligned with students' needs for better learning outcomes.
1 answer