To analyze Patel's work, let's break down the division and his multiplication check.
-
Division:
- Patel computed \( 8 \div \frac{1}{6} \).
- Dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal, so: \[ 8 \div \frac{1}{6} = 8 \times 6 = 48 \] So, the correct quotient is 48.
-
Checking Work via Multiplication:
- Patel multiplied \( \frac{1}{48} \) by 6: \[ \frac{1}{48} \times 6 = \frac{6}{48} = \frac{1}{8} \] He seemed to be trying to show that \( \frac{1}{48} \) multiplied by 6 should yield \( \frac{1}{8} \) if the division was correct.
However, to check the division accurately, he should calculate:
- \( \frac{1}{48} \times 6 \) would yield \( \frac{1}{8} \) if \( 8 \div \frac{1}{6} = 48 \) is true. Therefore, his final result should indeed verify the multiplication check.
Conclusion
- Patel found the correct quotient (48) but did multiplication incorrectly in the context of checking (he provided intermediate steps that led to confusion about \( \frac{1}{8} \)).
Thus, the most accurate description of Patel’s work is: Patel found the correct quotient but checked his work using multiplication incorrectly.