To determine which of the options represents a characteristic of classical Greek democracy, we first need to analyze each statement:
-
The ability of average people to overthrow leaders with whom they disagree – This reflects a more populist aspect of democracy, where the collective voice of the citizens can lead to political change.
-
The justice system’s protection of the injured only through explicitly written legal codes – This suggests a legalistic approach, but it doesn’t necessarily capture the democratic essence of participation and representation.
-
The weighing of individual accomplishment above financial status – This aligns with democratic ideals of meritocracy, where individuals are valued for their contributions and abilities rather than their wealth.
-
The imitation of neighboring states’ laws and principles – While this might occur in a historical context, it doesn’t define Greek democracy itself.
Based on this analysis, the most characteristic of classical Greek democracy among the options provided is "The ability of average people to overthrow leaders with whom they disagree". This reflects the participatory nature of the political system in classical Greece, particularly in Athens, where citizens had a role in governance and the potential to challenge leadership.