To determine which expression is equivalent to \( 30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m) \) using the Associative Property, we can regroup the terms in the expression.
Here’s the original expression: \[ 30m + (21m - 53) + (18 - 2m) \]
We can first group the \(30m\) and \(21m\) together and then combine \( (18 - 2m) \): \[ (30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) - 53 \]
Now we can simplify: \[ 51m + (18 - 2m - 53) \]
This step shows that we can regroup as needed. However, to directly match the options given:
- Option 1: \( (49m - 53) + 16 \) does not simplify to the original expression.
- Option 2: \( 51m + (-53 + 18) - 2m \) reflects the grouping of \(51m\) and the combination of the constants. However, it simplifies differently.
- Option 3: \( 53m - 35 \) also does not match as it combines terms incorrectly.
- Option 4: \( (30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) \) is simply a regrouping of the original expression using the Associative Property.
The correct answer, which follows the Associative Property, is: \[ (30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) \] Thus, the equivalent expression is Option 4: \( (30m + 21m) + (18 - 2m) \).