A writer is crafting an argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license in their state to 14 years of age. Which evidence would give the most credible and reliable support for this argument?(1 point) Responses A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits. A national news broadcast reports that in South Dakota, teenagers as young as 14 years old can receive their restricted driver’s permits. A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers. A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers. An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation. An older man from a rural area states that he learned to drive at the age of seven and has never been in an accident or even received a citation. A local woman who is the mother of three children says that she wishes her 14-year-old daughter could drive in order to help her with her errands.

1 answer

The most credible and reliable support for the argument in favor of lowering the age to get a driver’s license to 14 years of age would be:

A professor of driving science recently observed that younger drivers have better eyesight and quicker reaction times than older drivers.

This evidence is based on scientific observation and research, which is generally considered more credible than anecdotal evidence or personal opinions. The expertise of a professor in driving science adds authority to the claim, making it a strong piece of supportive evidence for the argument.