A Wikipedia article might be considered a valid source for online research

1 answer

A Wikipedia article can be a useful starting point for online research, but it should not be considered a definitive or authoritative source. Here are some reasons why:

  1. Collaborative Editing: Wikipedia articles can be edited by anyone, which means that the information might not always be accurate or up-to-date.

  2. Citation Needed: While many articles reference primary or reputable secondary sources, it’s important to check the citations provided to verify the information.

  3. Varying Quality: The quality of articles can vary significantly. Some topics may have well-researched and comprehensive entries, while others may be lacking in depth or accuracy.

  4. Not Academic: Wikipedia is not an academic source and is often not acceptable for scholarly work. Academic and peer-reviewed articles, books, and credible reports are generally preferred.

  5. Good for Overview: Wikipedia can be helpful for gaining a general understanding of a topic and for finding references or links to more reliable sources.

In summary, while Wikipedia can be a valuable resource for an initial overview or context, it should ideally be supplemented with more reliable and scholarly sources for thorough research.