A) Which statement best summarizes why the Ottomans wanted to take over Constantinople?

Question

(1 point)
Controlling Constantinople would ensure that the Ottomans would be able to take over the rest of
Europe and complete their empire.
The Ottomans wanted to take revenge on Europeans for the Crusades.
The Ottomans wanted a home base that was not in Asia so they could take over the Mongol
Empire.
Controlling Constantinople would ensure dominance over major trade routes and make the
Ottoman Empire very wealthy.

Answer 1

The statement that best summarizes why the Ottomans wanted to take over Constantinople is:

Controlling Constantinople would ensure dominance over major trade routes and make the Ottoman Empire very wealthy.

This encapsulates the strategic and economic motivations behind the conquest of Constantinople, as it was a key trading hub connecting Europe and Asia.

Answer 2

A) Which of the following is a reason the Europeans wanted to find a maritime route to the
East? (1 point)
They wanted to establish diplomatic relations with China quickly, and a maritime route would be a
faster way to get there.
They feared for their safety on the Silk Road with the Mongol Empire collapsing.
They were hoping to beat the Ottomans in establishing trading posts in the Indian Ocean.
They were hoping to establish their own home base on foreign soil to control the prices of goods.

Answer 3

The reason the Europeans wanted to find a maritime route to the East is:

They were hoping to beat the Ottomans in establishing trading posts in the Indian Ocean.

This answer reflects the desire of European powers to access trade routes and markets directly, particularly as competition with the Ottomans and other powers increased during that period.

Answer 4

A) Which statement best explains the relationship between the Holy Roman Empire and the
Ottoman Empire? (1 point)
They practiced different sects of Islam and fought after one Ottoman ruler declared that the Holy
Roman Empire was a threat to Islam.
They engaged in conflict over land in Austria and Hungary and practiced different religions.
The Ottomans enslaved young Roman boys and forced them to fight in their armies.
They did not trade with one another, and those that associated with the Holy Roman Empire
could be arrested.

Answer 5

The statement that best explains the relationship between the Holy Roman Empire and the Ottoman Empire is:

They engaged in conflict over land in Austria and Hungary and practiced different religions.

This captures the essence of their relationship, which was marked by territorial disputes and religious differences, particularly between the primarily Catholic Holy Roman Empire and the Muslim Ottoman Empire.

Answer 6

A) Which statement describes the Ottoman devshirme system? (1 point)
It taxed Jews more heavily than Muslims.
It prevented Muslims from having to pay taxes.
It divided non-Muslims into distinct religious communities.
It enslaved Christian boys in the Balkans and made them become soldiers

Answer 7

The statement that describes the Ottoman devshirme system is:

It enslaved Christian boys in the Balkans and made them become soldiers.

The devshirme system involved the recruitment of Christian boys from the Balkans, who were taken, converted to Islam, and trained to serve in the military, particularly as elite soldiers known as Janissaries.

Answer 8

A) An investigation of the economic importance of Constantinople under the Ottomans might
focus on which of the following? (1 point)
Constantinople’s history of republican government
Constantinople’s traditional hostility to merchants
Constantinople’s small and homogenous population
Constantinople’s strategic location

Answer 9

An investigation of the economic importance of Constantinople under the Ottomans might focus on:

Constantinople’s strategic location.

Constantinople's position at the crossroads of Europe and Asia made it a crucial hub for trade routes, facilitating commerce between different regions and contributing significantly to the wealth of the Ottoman Empire.