A) Which of the following best summarizes Russia’s expansion as an empire under Ivan IV in

the sixteenth century? (1 point)
Ivan IV was the first to attempt to expand the Russian territory in every direction.
Ivan IV used gunpowder weapons in new ways to take over areas he wanted.
Ivan IV successfully acquired access to the Baltic Sea through military conquest.
Ivan IV acquired Siberia even though the Cossacks refused to help him.

9 answers

The best summary of Russia’s expansion as an empire under Ivan IV in the sixteenth century is: Ivan IV was the first to attempt to expand the Russian territory in every direction.

This statement captures the essence of Ivan IV's ambitions, as he was known for initiating significant territorial expansion, laying the groundwork for Russia's future empire, although the other options do have elements of truth, they do not encapsulate the broader context of his expansion efforts.

A) An investigation of Russian imperial methods of political control reveals which of the
following? (1 point)
The tsar was head of the empire and the most powerful, but he had to work with others to
achieve political control.
The church was the most important fixture in Russian life, and people followed it more than the
tsar.
The yasak tribute system was a very ineffective method of political control because it did not
benefit the empire.
The tsar had to repeatedly work to remove all people who seemed to be obstacles to his rule.

The statement that best reflects the investigation of Russian imperial methods of political control is: The tsar was head of the empire and the most powerful, but he had to work with others to achieve political control.

This option accurately captures the need for collaboration and alliances within the political structure of the empire while acknowledging the tsar's overarching authority. The other statements, while they touch on various aspects of Russian society and governance, do not comprehensively summarize the methods of political control as effectively.

A) Which of the following best explains why Ivan IV created the oprichnina during his reign?
(1 point)
Ivan no longer had a good relationship with the Russian Orthodox Christian Church and wanted
to destroy it.
Ivan IV had been overthrown by the boyars and was trying to regain his power .
Ivan was not popular in cities like Novgorod where people rose up against his rule.
Ivan IV was struggling against the boyars and wanted to limit their power .

The statement that best explains why Ivan IV created the oprichnina during his reign is: Ivan IV was struggling against the boyars and wanted to limit their power.

The oprichnina was established as a means for Ivan IV to consolidate power and combat the influence of the boyars, who he viewed as a significant threat to his authority. This response aligns with the historical context of his reign, where his conflict with the nobility played a central role in the establishment of this institution.

A) Which of the following best describes the role the warrior classes played in medieval
Japan’s economy? (1 point)
Warriors stopped trading during the Warring States period because of the fighting.
Warriors made sure that the shogun did not become patrons of guilds.
Warriors tried to control the market because it was an important role the shogun gave them.
Warriors served the shogun throughout the country, which meant they purchased goods
throughout Japan.

The best description of the role the warrior classes played in medieval Japan’s economy is: Warriors served the shogun throughout the country, which meant they purchased goods throughout Japan.

During the medieval period, especially under the shogunate, the samurai and warrior classes played a significant role in the economy by engaging in trade and purchasing goods, thereby influencing local economies as they served their lords. They were not only warriors but also landholders and patrons of local economies.

A) Which of the following statements best summarizes feudal Japan’s social hierarchy?
(1 point)
Merchants ranked highest in the social hierarchy because they became wealthy.
Members of the warrior classes tended to hold more political power in feudal Japan.
The emperor was at the head of the social hierarchy because that role had existed for so long.
Farmers/peasants were lowest in the social hierarchy because there were not many of them.

The statement that best summarizes feudal Japan’s social hierarchy is: Members of the warrior classes tended to hold more political power in feudal Japan.

In feudal Japan, the samurai and warrior classes were at the top of the social hierarchy in terms of political power and influence, even though the emperor was considered the formal head of state. The actual governing authority and power resided with the shogun and the samurai, making this statement the most accurate representation of the social structure.