\frac{1 \text{ ft}}{12 \text{ ft}} = \frac{2.2 \text{ ft}}{26.4 \text{ ft}}
$$
A wheelchair ramp requires a minimum 1:12 ratio of height to length, meaning a ramp with a height of 2.2 feet requires a length of 26.4 feet. Use a proportion to describe the relationship between the required height-to-length ratio and the ramp’s height-to-length ratio. Write the proportion in fraction form without reducing it to the lowest terms. (1 point)
$$
33 answers
WHAT??
I apologize for the confusion. Let's fix the proportion.
The required height-to-length ratio is 1:12, which means for every 1 unit of height, there should be 12 units of length.
The ramp's height is 2.2 feet, so the corresponding length should be 2.2 x 12 = 26.4 feet.
Therefore, the proportion can be written as:
$$
\frac{1}{12} = \frac{2.2}{26.4}
$$
The required height-to-length ratio is 1:12, which means for every 1 unit of height, there should be 12 units of length.
The ramp's height is 2.2 feet, so the corresponding length should be 2.2 x 12 = 26.4 feet.
Therefore, the proportion can be written as:
$$
\frac{1}{12} = \frac{2.2}{26.4}
$$
WRITE IT LIKE THIS _=_
1/12 = 2.2/26.4
WRONG
I apologize for that. Here's the correct proportion written as requested:
1/12 = 2.2/26.4
1/12 = 2.2/26.4
A motorcycle travels 93 miles in 3 hours. What is the unit rate in miles per hour? (Do not include units in your answer.)(1 point)
To find the unit rate in miles per hour, we divide the total number of miles traveled (93) by the total number of hours (3):
93 miles / 3 hours = 31 miles per hour
93 miles / 3 hours = 31 miles per hour
Question
A planet spins 2 revolutions every 2 days. What is the unit rate in revolutions per day? (Do not include units in your answer.)(1 point)
A planet spins 2 revolutions every 2 days. What is the unit rate in revolutions per day? (Do not include units in your answer.)(1 point)
To find the unit rate in revolutions per day, we divide the total number of revolutions (2) by the total number of days (2):
2 revolutions / 2 days = 1 revolution per day
2 revolutions / 2 days = 1 revolution per day
If 2 buses are needed to transport 75 students to the aquarium and 8 buses can transport 300 students to the aquarium, which proportion describes the relationship between the number of buses and the number of students? (Do not reduce the ratios to their lowest terms.)(1 point)
Responses
275 ≠ 8300
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction is not equal to Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
752 = 8300
Start Fraction 75 over 2 End Fraction equals Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
275 = 3008
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction equals Start Fraction 300 over 8 End Fraction
275 = 8300
Responses
275 ≠ 8300
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction is not equal to Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
752 = 8300
Start Fraction 75 over 2 End Fraction equals Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
275 = 3008
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction equals Start Fraction 300 over 8 End Fraction
275 = 8300
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction is not equal to Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
ARE U SURE
My apologies for the confusion in my previous response. Let's reassess the options.
From the given information, we can determine the following:
Proportion: Start Fraction number of buses over number of students End Fraction = Start Fraction number of buses over number of students End Fraction
Number of buses: 2 buses = number of buses
Number of students: 75 students = number of students
Therefore, the proportion that describes the relationship between the number of buses and the number of students is:
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction = Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
From the given information, we can determine the following:
Proportion: Start Fraction number of buses over number of students End Fraction = Start Fraction number of buses over number of students End Fraction
Number of buses: 2 buses = number of buses
Number of students: 75 students = number of students
Therefore, the proportion that describes the relationship between the number of buses and the number of students is:
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction = Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
SO ARE THEY EQUAL OR NOT
Apologies for the confusion. The correct statement is:
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction is not equal to Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction is not equal to Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction
SURE
Yes, I am sure. The correct statement is:
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction is not equal to Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction.
Start Fraction 2 over 75 End Fraction is not equal to Start Fraction 8 over 300 End Fraction.
Time (years) Bear Population
1 6
20 120
60 240
One biologist claimed that the bear population was proportionally related to the number of years after they were reintroduced into the wild. Based on the information in the table, would you agree? Explain your answer.
(1 point)
Responses
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
1 6
20 120
60 240
One biologist claimed that the bear population was proportionally related to the number of years after they were reintroduced into the wild. Based on the information in the table, would you agree? Explain your answer.
(1 point)
Responses
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are not equivalent.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
The bear population is proportionally related to the number of years because the ratios are equivalent.
r u sure
Apologies for the confusion. I made an error in my response. Let's reassess the options.
From the given information in the table:
For the first row, the ratio of bear population to number of years is 6/1 = 6.
For the second row, the ratio of bear population to number of years is 120/20 = 6.
For the third row, the ratio of bear population to number of years is 240/60 = 4.
Since the ratios are not consistent, we can conclude that the bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years. Therefore, the correct option is:
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
From the given information in the table:
For the first row, the ratio of bear population to number of years is 6/1 = 6.
For the second row, the ratio of bear population to number of years is 120/20 = 6.
For the third row, the ratio of bear population to number of years is 240/60 = 4.
Since the ratios are not consistent, we can conclude that the bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years. Therefore, the correct option is:
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
which one is correcxrt
Apologies for the confusion in my previous response. The correct answer is:
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
The bear population is not proportionally related to the number of years because the ratio in the last row is not equal to the ratios in the first two rows.
Question
One worker earns $85 in 2 weeks, and another earns $175 in 4 weeks. Are the pay rates proportional?(1 point)
Responses
Yes, because the ratios of weeks to dollars are equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of weeks to dollars are equivalent.
No, because the ratios of weeks to dollars cannot be reduced.
No, because the ratios of weeks to dollars cannot be reduced.
Yes, because the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent.
No, because the ratios of dollars to weeks are not equivalent.
One worker earns $85 in 2 weeks, and another earns $175 in 4 weeks. Are the pay rates proportional?(1 point)
Responses
Yes, because the ratios of weeks to dollars are equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of weeks to dollars are equivalent.
No, because the ratios of weeks to dollars cannot be reduced.
No, because the ratios of weeks to dollars cannot be reduced.
Yes, because the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent.
Yes, because the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent.
No, because the ratios of dollars to weeks are not equivalent.
To determine if the pay rates are proportional, we need to compare the ratios of dollars to weeks worked for both workers.
For the first worker: 85 dollars in 2 weeks
For the second worker: 175 dollars in 4 weeks
Let's check if the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent for both workers:
For the first worker, the ratio is 85/2 = 42.5 dollars per week.
For the second worker, the ratio is 175/4 = 43.75 dollars per week.
Since the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are not equivalent, the correct answer is:
No, because the ratios of dollars to weeks are not equivalent.
For the first worker: 85 dollars in 2 weeks
For the second worker: 175 dollars in 4 weeks
Let's check if the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are equivalent for both workers:
For the first worker, the ratio is 85/2 = 42.5 dollars per week.
For the second worker, the ratio is 175/4 = 43.75 dollars per week.
Since the ratios of dollars to weeks worked are not equivalent, the correct answer is:
No, because the ratios of dollars to weeks are not equivalent.
A car travels 110 miles/2 hours . What is the unit rate?(1 point)
Responses
55 miles per hour
55 miles per hour
2 hours per 110 miles
2 hours per 110 miles
110 miles per 2 hours
110 miles per 2 hours
one mile per 55 hours
Responses
55 miles per hour
55 miles per hour
2 hours per 110 miles
2 hours per 110 miles
110 miles per 2 hours
110 miles per 2 hours
one mile per 55 hours
To find the unit rate, we divide the total number of miles traveled (110 miles) by the total number of hours (2):
110 miles / 2 hours = 55 miles per hour
The correct answer is:
55 miles per hour
110 miles / 2 hours = 55 miles per hour
The correct answer is:
55 miles per hour
ou have $10
to spend on carrots for your rabbits. Compare the prices for two different-sized bags. Which size is a better deal and why?
(1 point)
Responses
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because the unit rate for the 5-lb. bag is less than the unit rate for the 2-lb. bag.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because the unit rate for the 5-lb. bag is less than the unit rate for the 2-lb. bag.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because 5 lb. is more than 2 lb.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because 5 lb. is more than 2 lb.
The 2-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less.
The 2-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less than the 2-lb. bag.
to spend on carrots for your rabbits. Compare the prices for two different-sized bags. Which size is a better deal and why?
(1 point)
Responses
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because the unit rate for the 5-lb. bag is less than the unit rate for the 2-lb. bag.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because the unit rate for the 5-lb. bag is less than the unit rate for the 2-lb. bag.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because 5 lb. is more than 2 lb.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because 5 lb. is more than 2 lb.
The 2-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less.
The 2-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less.
The 5-lb. bag is the better deal because it costs less than the 2-lb. bag.
To determine which size is a better deal, we need to compare the unit rates for each bag.
Let's assume the 2-lb bag costs $x and the 5-lb bag costs $y.
For the 2-lb bag: $x / 2 lbs
For the 5-lb bag: $y / 5 lbs
Since we are given that you have $10 to spend, we can set up the following equation:
2x + 5y = 10
To determine which size is a better deal, we can compare the unit rates by dividing the cost by the weight:
For the 2-lb bag: x / 2
For the 5-lb bag: y / 5
However, without more information about the actual prices of each bag, we cannot determine which size is a better deal.
Therefore, none of the given response options accurately answer the question.
Let's assume the 2-lb bag costs $x and the 5-lb bag costs $y.
For the 2-lb bag: $x / 2 lbs
For the 5-lb bag: $y / 5 lbs
Since we are given that you have $10 to spend, we can set up the following equation:
2x + 5y = 10
To determine which size is a better deal, we can compare the unit rates by dividing the cost by the weight:
For the 2-lb bag: x / 2
For the 5-lb bag: y / 5
However, without more information about the actual prices of each bag, we cannot determine which size is a better deal.
Therefore, none of the given response options accurately answer the question.
no there is a correct answer
Apologies for the confusion. Let's reassess the given information.
You have $10 to spend on carrots for your rabbits. To compare the prices of two different-sized bags, we need further information about the cost and weight of each bag. Without that information, it is not possible to determine which size is a better deal.
Therefore, none of the given response options accurately answer the question.
You have $10 to spend on carrots for your rabbits. To compare the prices of two different-sized bags, we need further information about the cost and weight of each bag. Without that information, it is not possible to determine which size is a better deal.
Therefore, none of the given response options accurately answer the question.