To determine the classification of the triangle with side lengths of 1 cm and 13 cm, we need to consider the triangle inequality theorem, which states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the third side.
- Let the sides be \(a = 1\) cm, \(b = 13\) cm, and \(c\) be the unknown side length.
- Applying the triangle inequality:
- \(a + b > c\) → \(1 + 13 > c\) → \(14 > c\)
- \(a + c > b\) → \(1 + c > 13\) → \(c > 12\)
- \(b + c > a\) → \(13 + c > 1\) → always true for positive \(c\)
From the second inequality \(c > 12\) and the first \(c < 14\), we can conclude:
- The only integer that satisfies \(12 < c < 14\) is \(c = 13\), but that would mean two sides (1 cm and 13 cm) are equal which would make the triangle isosceles.
If we consider \(c\) to be any value greater than 12 and less than 14, we cannot form a triangle with 1 cm and 13 cm and any integer third side.
Since it is impossible to satisfy the triangle inequality with side lengths 1 cm, 13 cm, and a whole number, this configuration does not form a triangle at all. Therefore, it does not fit into any of the provided classifications (scalene, acute, isosceles, equilateral).
If a valid triangle existed, it would have likely been classified as an isosceles triangle, but the conditions of triangle formation fail here.
3 answers