To determine which option would be the most direct way for the town to improve its speed-limit enforcement, let's analyze each of the provided options:
A) Hiring crossing guards could help protect pedestrians from speeders at key intersections, but it does not directly address the enforcement of speed limits themselves. This option focuses more on pedestrian safety rather than directly curbing speeding behaviors.
B) Building sidewalks would enhance safety for pedestrians but does not address speeding violations directly. While improved infrastructure might encourage safer behaviors, it doesn’t actively enforce speed limits or deter speeding.
C) Hiring more law enforcement officers specifically to enforce speed limits would directly target the issue of speeding. More officers on the roads would likely result in increased surveillance, more traffic stops, and ultimately more enforcement of the speed limits, making this option the most direct method to address the problem.
D) Having police officers educate students about the importance of following speed limits could raise awareness and foster a culture of safety, but this is more of a long-term educational approach rather than an immediate enforcement solution. It does not provide immediate consequences for speeding behavior.
Considering these analyses, option C (hiring more law enforcement officers to enforce the town's speed limits) is the most direct way for the town to improve speed-limit enforcement. It actively targets the behavior in question and can lead to immediate changes in compliance among drivers.