Let's analyze the teacher's equations and inequalities step by step to understand them better.
-
Understanding the Variables:
- Let \( n \) be the number of students attending the trip.
- At Orchard A, each person (students and chaperones) costs $9, and she needs 3 chaperones, leading to \( n + 3 \) total people.
- At Orchard B, each person costs $10, and only 1 chaperone is needed, leading to \( n + 1 \) total people.
-
Setting Up the Equation: The teacher's equation \( 9(n + 3) = 10(n + 1) \) is used to find the point at which the total costs of both orchards are equal.
- Calculating the left side: \( 9(n + 3) = 9n + 27 \)
- Calculating the right side: \( 10(n + 1) = 10n + 10 \)
So, the equation becomes: \[ 9n + 27 = 10n + 10 \] Rearranging gives: \[ 27 - 10 = 10n - 9n \implies 17 = n \] This means that when there are 17 students, the costs of both orchards are the same.
-
Setting Up the Inequality: The teacher's inequality \( 9(n + 3) < 10(n + 1) \) is used to find out when Orchard A is cheaper than Orchard B. Using the same expressions as before, the inequality becomes: \[ 9n + 27 < 10n + 10 \] Rearranging gives: \[ 27 - 10 < 10n - 9n \implies 17 < n \] This means Orchard A will be cheaper when the number of students \( n \) is greater than 17.
-
Conclusions:
- If there are exactly 17 students, both orchards cost the same.
- If there are fewer than 17 students, Orchard B is cheaper (the inequality \( 9(n + 3) > 10(n + 1) \)).
- If there are more than 17 students, Orchard A becomes the cheaper option (the inequality \( 9(n + 3) < 10(n + 1) \)).
So, the teacher can use this information to make a decision based on the number of students attending.