The correct answer is: She is wrong. The higher the drop, the more kinetic energy the ball will have upon hitting the ground.
When an object is dropped from a height, its potential energy is converted into kinetic energy as it falls. The kinetic energy just before it hits the ground can be calculated using the formula:
\[ KE = mgh \]
where \( KE \) is kinetic energy, \( m \) is the mass of the ball, \( g \) is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s²), and \( h \) is the height from which it was dropped.
Since the kinetic energy increases with height, a ball dropped from 3.0 meters would have more kinetic energy upon hitting the ground than if it were dropped from a lower height. Therefore, it is incorrect to claim that it would have fewer than 96 joules of kinetic energy without additional context (such as the mass of the ball).