A student claims that the planets orbit the Sun because of gravitational force. Which statement best supports this claim ?

options:

Planets are far away from the Sun which makes them have a stronger gravitational force.
Planets are far away from the Sun which makes them have a stronger gravitational force.

The Sun has a stronger gravitational field because it has a larger mass.
The Sun has a stronger gravitational field because it has a larger mass.

The planets have a stronger gravitational field compared to the Sun because they have less mass.
The planets have a stronger gravitational field compared to the Sun because they have less mass.

The Sun has a stronger gravitational field because it was the first part of the solar system to form.

11 answers

The statement that best supports the claim that planets orbit the Sun because of gravitational force is:

The Sun has a stronger gravitational field because it has a larger mass.

This is because the gravitational force between two objects (in this case, the Sun and the planets) depends on their masses and the distance between them, as described by Newton's law of universal gravitation. The Sun's large mass creates a strong gravitational pull that keeps the planets in orbit around it.

Scientists discovered two new planets: planet X and planet Y. They have identical volumes, but the mass of planet X is two times greater than the mass of planet Y. If two identical space probes land on each planet, which of the following will be true?

options:

The weight of the space probe on planet X will be greater than the weight of the space probe on planet Y.
The weight of the space probe on planet X will be greater than the weight of the space probe on planet Y.

The weight of the space probe on planet Y will be greater than the weight of the space probe on planet X.
The weight of the space probe on planet Y will be greater than the weight of the space probe on planet X.

The mass of the space probe on planet Y will be greater than the mass of the space probe on planet X.
The mass of the space probe on planet Y will be greater than the mass of the space probe on planet X.

The mass of the space probe on planet X will be greater than the mass of the space probe on planet Y.

The correct statement is:

The weight of the space probe on planet X will be greater than the weight of the space probe on planet Y.

Weight is a measure of the gravitational force acting on an object's mass. Since the two planets have identical volumes but planet X has a mass that is two times greater than that of planet Y, it will exert a stronger gravitational force. Therefore, the weight of the space probe on planet X will be greater than on planet Y.

It's important to note that the mass of the space probes will be the same on both planets, as mass is an intrinsic property of an object and does not change based on location.

Which statement best describes the gravitational force between objects?

options:

Only large massed objects exert gravitational force on every other object.
Only large massed objects exert gravitational force on every other object.

Only large massed objects exert gravitational force on objects close to them.
Only large massed objects exert gravitational force on objects close to them.

Objects exert a gravitational force on every other object.
Objects exert a gravitational force on every other object.

Objects exert a gravitational force only on objects close to them.

The statement that best describes the gravitational force between objects is:

Objects exert a gravitational force on every other object.

This statement reflects the universal law of gravitation, which states that every mass attracts every other mass with a force that is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. Therefore, all objects, regardless of size or mass, exert a gravitational force on each other, although the strength of that force may vary significantly based on their masses and the distance between them.

For two charges to attract each other, both must be ______________.

options:

negative
negative

opposite
opposite

neutral
neutral

positive

For two charges to attract each other, both must be opposite.

This means that if one charge is positive, the other must be negative for them to experience an attractive force. Like charges (both positive or both negative) will repel each other.

Jade has an iron rod around which she wraps copper wire. She places the device on a table near a compass. What will she observe about the compass if she sends current through the copper wire?

options:

The needle of the compass will show no effect.
The needle of the compass will show no effect.

The needle of the compass will point toward the device.
The needle of the compass will point toward the device.

The needle of the compass will stop working.
The needle of the compass will stop working.

The needle of the compass will spin in circles.

If Jade sends current through the copper wire wrapped around the iron rod, she will observe:

The needle of the compass will point toward the device.

When an electric current flows through the copper wire, it creates a magnetic field around the wire. Since the iron rod is a ferromagnetic material, it can enhance the magnetic field produced by the current. As a result, the compass needle, which is influenced by magnetic fields, will align itself with the magnetic field generated by the current and will point toward the device where the current is flowing.

Read the passage about an investigation and answer the following question:

Camila is performing an investigation in which she wraps a current-carrying wire around an iron rod. She places the north pole of a bar magnet near the top of the rod. The magnet moves away from the rod. Camila claims that a field exists between the rod and the magnet.


Which argument best supports Camila’s claim?

options:

The current in the wire has created a magnetic field with its north pole at the top of the rod.
The current in the wire has created a magnetic field with its north pole at the top of the rod.

The current in the wire has created a magnetic field with its south pole at the top of the rod.
The current in the wire has created a magnetic field with its south pole at the top of the rod.

The current in the wire has created a gravitational field with its north pole at the top of the rod.
The current in the wire has created a gravitational field with its north pole at the top of the rod.

The current in the wire has created a gravitational field with its south pole at the top of the rod.

The argument that best supports Camila’s claim is:

The current in the wire has created a magnetic field with its north pole at the top of the rod.

When electric current flows through the wire wrapped around the iron rod, it generates a magnetic field. The orientation of this magnetic field can be determined by the right-hand rule. If the north pole of a bar magnet is moved away from the rod, it suggests that the magnetic field created by the current in the wire is indeed influencing the behavior of the bar magnet. Thus, Camila's observation about the movement of the magnet supports the existence of a magnetic field between the rod and the magnet.