Asked by Kid
A single vertical slit of width 24000 nm is located 2.10 m from a screen. The intensity pattern below is observed. The distances on the screen can be measured from the scale. Each tick mark is equal to 1 cm. Intensity is displayed along the y-axis. What is the wavelength of the light?
My attempt at the solution:
1cm = 0.01m
From the intensity pattern diagram, it appears that the first m of diffraction = 1 occurs at the fourth tick mark (which I interpret as 0.04m from the tick mark at the central max).
tan(theta) = y/L
= 0.04m/2.10m
= 0.019047619
= 0.0190
theta turns out to be 1.091216225deg which is small, so I used the "small angle approximation" in which tan(theta) = sin(theta) = 0.0190 approximately.
asin(theta) = (m)(lambda)
(24000*10^-9)(0.0190) = (1)(lambda)
lambda = 4.57*10^-7 m
That's the value I got for lambda but apparently it's incorrect. Could someone please help me figure out what I did wrong?
My attempt at the solution:
1cm = 0.01m
From the intensity pattern diagram, it appears that the first m of diffraction = 1 occurs at the fourth tick mark (which I interpret as 0.04m from the tick mark at the central max).
tan(theta) = y/L
= 0.04m/2.10m
= 0.019047619
= 0.0190
theta turns out to be 1.091216225deg which is small, so I used the "small angle approximation" in which tan(theta) = sin(theta) = 0.0190 approximately.
asin(theta) = (m)(lambda)
(24000*10^-9)(0.0190) = (1)(lambda)
lambda = 4.57*10^-7 m
That's the value I got for lambda but apparently it's incorrect. Could someone please help me figure out what I did wrong?
Answers
Answered by
bobpursley
are you certain the distance from the center to the first minium is .04m?
Answered by
Kid
[Replace each space with a dot(.)] Link to image related to this question-> lh3 googleusercontent com/TjcBG60hMmLnA7rwTp0hIb4SzI2gqZtebe8g3cjQ1rf8xd0HXulzCNZTrTrVzw0zPyNC=s147
Answered by
Kid
Oh wait, that might not have been posted properly. Just put a dot after "Ih3" and "googleusercontent". I needed to show you the image because I feel that is the issue, that I may not have correctly interpreted the distance of the first m of diffraction.
Answered by
Kid
Nevermind, apparently that distance value was 0.043 which I was not certain before because it was based on more of an estimation rather than a definite value. So all good now!
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!
Submit Your Answer
We prioritize human answers over AI answers.
If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.