A search warrant has four categories of items that can be seized by the use of a search warrant.

Question

Besides "items that resulted from a crime", which of the following answers choices are items that can be seized?
C
d
Items that are inherently illegal for anyone to possess
Items that can be called "evidence" of a crime
Items used in committing the crime
All of the above.
Question 23 (4 points)
According to Katz vs United States 1967 Supreme Court ruling, the Supreme Court declared that a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Also, they created a two-pronged test to verify whether the suspect had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
What is the two-pronged test?
*Choose the correct two answer choices.
d
The individual must prove that he or she expected privacy
The government must prove that he or she expected privacy
The government must recognize that expectation is reasonable
Society must recognize that expectation is reasonable
Question 24(4 points)
In California vs Greenwood 1988, the Supreme Court ruled that when a person's trash is taken to the street, it is now open to the public and they can no longer have a reasonable expectation to the privacy of the contents of the trash.
• True
• False

Answer 1

Question 22: The four categories of items that can be seized by a search warrant are:

• Items that resulted from a crime
• Items that are inherently illegal for anyone to possess
• Items that can be called "evidence" of a crime
• Items used in committing the crime

Therefore, the correct answer is: All of the above.

---

Question 23: The two-pronged test for determining whether a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, as established in Katz vs. United States (1967), involves:

1. The individual must prove that he or she expected privacy.
2. Society must recognize that expectation is reasonable.

So the correct answer choices are:

• The individual must prove that he or she expected privacy.
• Society must recognize that expectation is reasonable.

---

Question 24: In California vs. Greenwood (1988), the Supreme Court ruled that once a person's trash is taken to the street, it is considered accessible to the public, and they can no longer have a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding the contents of that trash.

Therefore, the statement is True.