A scientist analyzes the data and information from an experimental investigation he conducted and realizes his hypothesis is wrong.

Question

Which choice best explains why his evidence is valuable?

Responses

The scientist should consider changing his empirical observations so his hypothesis is more correct than incorrect.
The scientist should consider changing his empirical observations so his hypothesis is more correct than incorrect.

The scientist should share his empirical observations so other scientists can also learn from his experimental investigation.
The scientist should share his empirical observations so other scientists can also learn from his experimental investigation.

The scientist should consider changing the area of science in which he is working because he may be more successful in another field of study.
The scientist should consider changing the area of science in which he is working because he may be more successful in another field of study.

The scientist should write a conclusion in his science notebook using his empirical observations and keep the results to himself.

Answer 1

The best choice that explains why the scientist's evidence is valuable is:

The scientist should share his empirical observations so other scientists can also learn from his experimental investigation.

This response emphasizes the importance of collaboration and the sharing of knowledge within the scientific community. By sharing his findings, even if they contradict his initial hypothesis, the scientist contributes to the collective understanding of the subject and helps others avoid similar misconceptions or guide future research.