To test the economist's claim that less than 14% of U.S. adults have a great deal of confidence in banks, we set up the following hypotheses:
Null Hypothesis (H0): The proportion of U.S. adults who have a great deal of confidence in banks is 14% or more. \[ H_0: p \geq 0.14 \]
Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The proportion of U.S. adults who have a great deal of confidence in banks is less than 14%. \[ H_1: p < 0.14 \]
Since the economist is claiming that the proportion is less than a specified value (14%), this is a left-tailed test.
Testing at the significance levels \( \alpha = 0.10 \) and \( \alpha = 0.01 \)
To conduct the test, we need to calculate the sample proportion, the standard error, and then the test statistic.
-
Calculate the Sample Proportion (\( \hat{p} \)): \[ \hat{p} = \frac{x}{n} = \frac{143}{1342} \approx 0.1065 \]
-
Standard Error (SE): \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{p_0(1 - p_0)}{n}} \] Where \( p_0 = 0.14 \): \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.14 \times (1 - 0.14)}{1342}} \approx \sqrt{\frac{0.14 \times 0.86}{1342}} \approx \sqrt{\frac{0.1204}{1342}} \approx 0.00943 \]
-
Calculate the Z-Score: \[ Z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{SE} = \frac{0.1065 - 0.14}{0.00943} \approx \frac{-0.0335}{0.00943} \approx -3.55 \]
-
Find the P-value: Using standard normal distribution tables or calculators, find the P-value corresponding to \( Z = -3.55 \). The P-value is approximately 0.0002.
Conclusion of the test:
- For \( \alpha = 0.10 \): Since \( P\text{-value} \approx 0.0002 < 0.10 \), we reject the null hypothesis.
- For \( \alpha = 0.01 \): Since \( P\text{-value} \approx 0.0002 < 0.01 \), we reject the null hypothesis.
Final Conclusion:
At both significance levels (0.10 and 0.01), we can conclude that there is enough evidence to support the economist's claim that less than 14% of U.S. adults have a great deal of confidence in banks and other financial institutions.