A piece of coastal land in the surrounding fishing areas have been occupied by a phishing society. For centuries this society does not have a government or acknowledge that any larger government rules over then two political scientists consider the society described here to be a country.

Answer 1

The assertion made by the two political scientists that the phishing society qualifies as a country raises important questions regarding the criteria used to define a country.

Traditionally, a country is characterized by a defined territory, a permanent population, a government, and the ability to enter into relations with other sovereign states. However, in this scenario, the fishing society lacks a government and does not acknowledge any larger governing body. This absence of a formal system of governance challenges the conventional notion of a country.

To determine whether the fishing society can be considered a country, it is necessary to examine alternative criteria and considerations. Some political theories argue that a country's status should be determined by the ability to effectively govern, maintain order, and provide necessary services to its citizens. In this case, if the fishing society has some form of self-governance or social structure that ensures peace, justice, and welfare for its members, it could be seen as functioning as a country at a local level.

Additionally, factors such as a shared cultural identity, a distinct legal system, and the ability to sustain economic activities may also influence the classification of the fishing society as a country. If the phishing society has a unique cultural heritage, customary laws, and an economic system that sustains their livelihood, these factors could provide an argument for considering them as a distinct entity.

Ultimately, the categorization of the phishing society as a country, despite the absence of a formal government, would depend on the ways in which the society fulfills or deviates from conventional criteria, as well as the adoption of alternative perspectives on national sovereignty and governance.