This statement can be true in some cases. Efficiency measurement involves comparing the actual output to the expected output, often expressed as a percentage. If a person fails to meet the output standards, their efficiency can still be shown as more than 100% if the standards set were too low or were not achievable.
For example, if a worker was expected to complete 20 tasks per day, but they completed only 18 tasks while other workers could only complete 15 tasks, they are still failing to meet the output standards. However, compared to their peers, they are more efficient, and their efficiency rating might be calculated as more than 100% in that particular context.
It is also essential to keep in mind that efficiency doesn't always equate effectiveness. A person may be efficient at doing their tasks but not as effective in terms of the overall quality or impact of their work.
A person that fails to meet output standards could still have an efficiency measurement of more than 100%.
1 answer