Yes. After summarizing a work of fiction, peer reviewers should describe its strengths. Julia’s comment about Peter’s effective plot development is a constructive and appropriate part of the peer review process, which typically involves sharing both strengths and areas for improvement.
A peer review group summarized Peter’s story, and then Julia said, “I felt that Peter did a really good job developing the story’s plot. The sequence of events made sense but was still surprising.” Was this an appropriate thing for Julia to do?
No. Right after summarizing, the group should suggest changes.
Yes. After summarizing a work of fiction, peer reviewers should describe its strengths.
Yes. Peer reviewers should only identify the strengths in each story.
No. Julia should hold her opinion until the end of the review session.
1 answer
1 answer