A patient reports side effects from a medication. A government committee learns about the side effects and decides the medication is not safe for public use. Did the committee use science to make the decision?(1 point)

Question

Responses

Yes; all medicine is science.
Yes; all medicine is science.

Yes; the committee used research.
Yes; the committee used research.

No; the committee used an anecdote.
No; the committee used an anecdote.

No; committees use rules, not science.

Answer 1

The correct response is: Yes; the committee used research.

The decision made by the committee to determine the medication's safety likely involved reviewing scientific studies, clinical trials, and reports of side effects rather than relying on individual anecdotes.

Answer 2

Which type of research might result in a law that restricts hunting of a particular species?(1 point)
Responses

research showing an increase in the population of the species
research showing an increase in the population of the species

research showing a decrease in the popularity of hunting
research showing a decrease in the popularity of hunting

research showing the species is harmful
research showing the species is harmful

research showing the species is endangered in other geographical areas

Answer 3

The correct response is: research showing the species is endangered in other geographical areas.

This type of research would likely raise concerns about the species' overall viability and could lead to laws that restrict hunting to protect it from potential extinction.

Answer 4

Which statement best explains why a rare disease would get more research funding than a more common disease?(1 point)
Responses

Corporations refuse to fund research for rare diseases.
Corporations refuse to fund research for rare diseases.

Sufferers of the rare disease ran a public awareness campaign.
Sufferers of the rare disease ran a public awareness campaign.

Diseases that affect more people tend to get more funding.
Diseases that affect more people tend to get more funding.

Organizations are concerned about the results of the research into the rare disease.

Answer 5

The best statement that explains why a rare disease might get more research funding than a more common disease is: Sufferers of the rare disease ran a public awareness campaign.

Public awareness campaigns can raise the visibility of a rare disease, garner support, and attract funding from organizations and governments.

Answer 6

A corporation funds scientific research to develop a fabric treatment that absorbs harmful rays from the sun. Which product does the corporation most likely manufacture?(1 point)
Responses

garden tools
garden tools

sunscreen
sunscreen

batteries
batteries

patio umbrellas

Answer 7

The corporation most likely manufactures: patio umbrellas.

A fabric treatment that absorbs harmful rays from the sun would be relevant to patio umbrellas, which are used outdoors to provide shade and protection from the sun's rays.

Answer 8

Which of these were reasons for Columbus’s first voyage from Spain? Select all that apply.
(1 point)
Responses

to find precious metals such as gold
to find precious metals such as gold

to see if the world was flat or round
to see if the world was flat or round

to find the fabled New World
to find the fabled New World

to find an easier route to Asia

Answer 9

The reasons for Columbus's first voyage from Spain include:

• to find precious metals such as gold
• to find an easier route to Asia

Columbus was motivated by the search for wealth and a more direct trade route to Asia, which was highly sought after for its spices and other valuable goods. The notion of proving whether the world was flat or round was common knowledge by that time, and Columbus was not primarily motivated by that idea. The "fabled New World" was not recognized as a goal until after his discovery.

Answer 10

Which of these is an accurate comparison of the results of the Columbian Exchange?
(1 point)
Responses

Europe benefited the most because ideas from the New World sparked the Renaissance.
Europe benefited the most because ideas from the New World sparked the Renaissance.

Both Europeans and Native Americans benefited from the trade, but the harm done to the Native Americans was greater.
Both Europeans and Native Americans benefited from the trade, but the harm done to the Native Americans was greater.

Native Americans benefited greatly from European plants and animals, but it took Europe several hundred years to find value in the Americas.
Native Americans benefited greatly from European plants and animals, but it took Europe several hundred years to find value in the Americas.

Both Europeans and Native Americans found new and useful things in the exchange, but Native American foods turned out to be poisonous to many European populations.

Answer 11

The most accurate comparison of the results of the Columbian Exchange is: Both Europeans and Native Americans benefited from the trade, but the harm done to the Native Americans was greater.

While the Columbian Exchange introduced new goods, plants, and animals to both sides, it also resulted in significant negative impacts on Native American populations, including loss of life due to disease, warfare, and colonization.