3 answers
It looks like you have a part-to-part-to-whole table that needs to be completed based on the provided totals. However, I need more context about how the table is structured (e.g., what the parts are, their relationships, and how they sum up to the total) to provide you with accurate missing values.
Could you please provide more details regarding the columns or the specific structure of the table? This way, I can help you better.
To fill in the missing values in a part-to-part-to-whole table, we need to understand how these values relate to each other. The table structure appears to consist of totals alongside blank spaces that presumably hold part values.
Given that each total is likely sum of the parts associated with it, let's consider the typical relationship between the parts and the corresponding whole.
If we have a table layout as:
| Whole | Part A | Part B | |-------|--------|--------| | 4 | ? | ? | | 5 | ? | ? | | 9 | ? | ? | | 36 | ? | ? | | 44 | ? | ? | | 55 | ? | ? | | 99 | ? | ? |
This implies:
Assuming Part A and Part B represent different categories that together make up the total, without specific initial values for Part A and Part B, we need a method to deduce part values.
Let’s define the relationship directly as:
Since there are no given values for Part A or Part B in your current description, we cannot directly compute without more specific information about how these values divide into their parts.
Please provide more context, like if any part values are known or if the relationship between parts is specific, so we can correctly fill in the blanks!
1 answer
1 answer
1 answer
11 answers