It seems like your message contains some typographical errors, making it a bit difficult to understand clearly. However, I'll do my best to interpret it. It appears you're asking about why an "onyx" (possibly intended to be "only," but let's assume you meant "onyx") and a "horse," perhaps in relation to "brown" and "proud," do not belong to the same species.
Assuming "onyx" refers to a type of mineral (a form of chalcedony) and you're comparing that to a "horse" (a living animal), the key reason they do not belong to the same species—or category, generally speaking—lies in their fundamental differences:
-
Classification: Onyxs are minerals composed of silicon dioxide, while horses are mammals belonging to the species Equus ferus caballus. They belong to entirely different classifications in biology and geology.
-
Characteristics: Minerals like onyx have distinct physical and chemical properties: they are inorganic, have a crystalline structure, and are not alive. Horses, on the other hand, exhibit biological processes, such as growth and reproduction, and are made up of organic cells.
-
Function: Onyx is often used in jewelry and decorative items due to its aesthetic properties, whereas horses have various roles in human culture, including transportation, work, and companionship.
Therefore, onyx and horses are fundamentally different in their nature, composition, and classification, leading to the conclusion that they do not belong to the same species or category.
If I misinterpreted your message, please provide clarification!
3 answers