Based on your request, it seems you are looking to outline Etienne's arguments about the potential harms of technology, as well as how he supports his points. Here’s a structured response:
(a) Note two points in which Etienne says that technology can cause harm
Point 1: Technology can lead to a loss of privacy, as personal data can be easily collected and misused by companies or governments, leading to surveillance and lack of individual autonomy.
Point 2: Technology can contribute to job displacement, as automation and artificial intelligence take over roles previously held by humans, resulting in economic inequality and social unrest.
(b) Why does he admit something that goes against his claim?
He admits something that goes against his claim because it demonstrates a balanced view of technology, acknowledging that while it has potential harms, it can also offer significant benefits and advancements.
(c) How does this actually strengthen his argument?
This strengthens his argument because it shows he has considered multiple sides of the issue. Acknowledging the potential benefits allows him to argue for moderation, regulation, or ethical considerations in technology's development and implementation, rather than outright rejection of technology.
Etienne's Comparisons
| Comparison | Analysis of Effect | |---------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Comparison to traditional tools | This makes his ideas clearer by highlighting how technology evolves but retains some similarities with past tools that have had both positive and negative impacts. | | Comparison to medical innovations | This could evoke mixed reactions; while it emphasizes the potential for positive change, it may also distract from the immediate harms, leading to a perception that all technological progress is beneficial. | | Comparison to social media platforms | This comparison clarifies how the interconnectedness of technology can amplify issues like misinformation and polarization, reinforcing his argument about harm. |
By analyzing these comparisons, it's possible to see how they can enhance understanding or potentially detract from the seriousness of his claims, depending on the context and audience's perspective.