A minimum of five justice votes must be included for a majority opinion to be issued.
A minimum of five justice votes must be included for what type of opinion to be issued?(1 point)
Responses majority opinion majority opinion dissenting opinion dissenting opinion per curiam opinion per curiam opinion concurrent opinion
7 answers
What best describes the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point) Responses The court must review all cases where a review is requested. The court must review all cases where a review is requested. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A majority vote of five justices requires a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A unanimous vote by the justices grants a review of the case. A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
The best description of the process used by the Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari is: A vote of four justices can grant a review of the case.
What type of jurisdiction gives the Supreme Court the authority to grant a writ of certiorari?(1 point) Responses original jurisdiction original jurisdiction appellate jurisdiction appellate jurisdiction Rule 10 Rule 10 appellate and original jurisdiction appellate and original jurisdiction
The type of jurisdiction that gives the Supreme Court the authority to grant a writ of certiorari is appellate jurisdiction.
What is the contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism in the Supreme Court?(1 point) Responses Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power. Judicial restraint means the court takes ownership of the issues; judicial activism means the court has a lot of power. Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches. Judicial restraint means the court does not include its own preferences; judicial activism means the court is silent on the issues of the branches. Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved. Judicial restraint means the court reviews the action; judicial activism means the court does not get involved. Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.
The correct contrast between judicial restraint and judicial activism is: Judicial restraint means the court does not get involved; judicial activism means the court reviews the action.